Unafraid: A Dystopian Future (Apocalypse)

This teaching is part of an ongoing series on approaching our fears with faith based in part on Adam Hamilton’s book, Unafraid.

Fear that the world is going to end soon has been great fodder for the movie industry, late-late night radio hosts, and comedians who make fun of religious leaders who call out a specific date for the world’s demise (shout out for the Bay Area’s own, Harold Camping!).  The latest fear is that Planet X (Nibiru) will come out of nowhere and smash our earth. 

Many conservative churches look forward to the day of Rapture, when God will take all the good sheep up to heaven and leave behind the rest for an awful period of hell on earth, ending in some surviving and most swimming in a lake of fire, after which all the dead in Christ will rise and find themselves living on a new earth that’s all pleasant and nice.  This may sound like a bad screenplay, but it is actually derived from a particularly narrow, literalistic view of the Bible without regard to it’s original context and with little question as to how to apply it today.  And, this Second Coming of Christ also happens to be the orthodox view – that’s how a lot of Christians think the end is going to come.  Many people watched scary movies like A Thief in the Night that sacred the hell right out of them, directing them into the arms of God where they would find salvation.

Of course, we don’t need religion to be afraid of the end of the world.  We’ve got nationalistic, ego driven world leaders to give us plenty of cause for alarm, with fingers on buttons that could trigger the end of the world as we know it.  Potentially, hundreds of millions of lives could be lost if everything went south.  But the world and humanity would not end.  Still, we live on the West Coast, on the North Bay of San Francisco, a lovely target for an evil empire to dial some missiles toward. 

Recall our acronym for FEAR: False Expectations Appearing Real.  And let’s remember Adam Hamilton’s reworking of that acronym: Face your fears with faith. Examine your assumptions in light of the facts. Attack your anxieties with action. Release your cares to God.  Let’s work this puppy over.

First, as Christians understanding God through a Jesus lens, we believe God is loving and good, and that since God’s fingerprints are on everything created, the flow of everything – even creation – is essentially good.  We have a theological reason to be basically optimistic that the odds are good that our worst fears will not come to pass, as has been the case for most fears we struggle with.  We catastrophize, wasting untold energy for nothing but an upset stomach.

As far as facts go, the nuclear arsenal of the United States and Russia has been significantly reduced over the last 30 years.  While we still have a lot, we don’t have enough, according to some sources, to completely eliminate life on earth.  We don’t have anywhere near enough to blow the earth up – luckily the Death Star was taken out a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away by cool people with British accents.  The worst case scenario is that up to 500 million people would die, mostly in specific, strategic urban areas.  The remaining seven billion people would carry humanity forward.  Specifically for us in Napa, CA, being approximately 50 miles from San Francisco and 86 miles from San Jose, and being that we are North of both, meaning winds are in our favor, we would definitely see the mushroom cloud, but not likely suffer direct loss.  More likely, we would be called upon to help provide support for recovery.  It is unlikely that Napa Valley would be the target for an attack, unless we’re talking about very, very conservative Baptists from Topeka, KS.  But they don’t have much more than picket signs in terms of weaponry.  So, the facts should alleviate our fear of nuclear threat.  Earthquakes and fires?  Well, who knows.  But those are surely more likely.

How do we attack our fears with action, then?  Let me suggest some specific, practical things, and then one major, sweeping, ideological thing.

First, the practical.  Most of us were here for the major earthquake that hit Napa in August 2014.  We can’t forget the fires of October 2017.  Both could have been much, much worse, of course, but I think both served to wake us up to a range of things we should be ready to face.  Because of our location, I seriously doubt we would go very long without being given aid from the government.  But for the short run, we should be ready for the next disaster.  So, have you done your homework and put together an emergency preparedness kit?  Get on it!  Have you secured stuff that could tip over?  Get on it!  You should have supplies to get you through the short term if you lose power, water, a cooking source, etc.  What about a trust?  Have you put that together yet so as to clarify to your loved ones where you want your property to go in the event of your death?  I don’t want to be morbid, but I can tell you from experience that I sleep better at night knowing that I’m fairly well prepared in the event of a natural disaster, and that my trust will make it easier for my kids to manage our estate if, God forbid, the 15 foot marble statue of Bono in our living room were to somehow take Lynne and I out in one fell swoop!  Getting your literal and figurative house in order is simply wise, and is an action you can take that will alleviate some of your anxiety of a dystopian future.

The sweeping thing I want to talk to you about has to do with our stance toward life as Jesus followers.  In Matthew’s Gospel, he remembers Jesus giving the disciples a charge to “go, make disciples of all nations.”  He didn’t give any qualifiers to his commission, as far as I know. He didn’t say, “except if you think the end is near” or “if you think you’re the only chosen ones”.  The charge he gave his disciples is the life he chose to live.  People who carried Good News (the meaning of Evangelism).  That’s who we’re supposed to be, and doing it like Jesus did is that way we’re supposed to do it.  Unfortunately, study of the end times has led many to abandon the way of Jesus for something that only pretends to resemble him.

I have two problems with orthodox Christianity’s view of the end times.  First, I think there has been a lack of appreciation of the first century context from which the related texts came, which was a time when apocalyptic fever ran especially high.  Why wouldn’t it?  Rome was in charge, and the only hope the Jews had was that God would swoop in and kick some serious butt!  Added to that the bias toward a literalistic view of the scriptures which assumes inerrancy and infallibility, and we’ve got ourselves a lousy hermeneutic.  I think Revelation reflects a reality that has largely already taken place, which is not hard to understand when the imagery used is understood in context.  So, I don’t think it points toward a sci-fi future.  The second issue I have with the position is how it has been used to generate fear to coax non-Christians toward God, and yet perpetuates fear among believers.  I have never seen a person deeply devoted to “End Times study” who becomes more compassionate toward especially non-Christians.  I have seen these folks get ugly, judgmental, and manipulative in order to win converts.  Or, I have seen people huddle down in the security of Christian community awaiting Christ’s return while the world outside suffers on.  Neither of these reflect Christ, in my opinion.

Jesus did not use fear to manipulate people into following him.  The only fear that may have been at work was the fear that a person had been basing their life on a lesser “good news” than the one Jesus offered.  He instead offered his presence, his teaching, his hands, and his healing to those he encountered.  Gracious beyond anyone’s expectation, willing to go where religious people wouldn’t be caught dead, welcoming of those who were deemed “unclean”, Jesus was Good News as much as he proclaimed Good News.  The Good News Jesus proclaimed was in contrast to Rome’s, which did offer some good news, but always with a looming threat.  Jesus’ Good News, however, was delivered with an undercurrent of love and grace.

As Hamilton noted, I would much rather been found dead in rubble trying to help people than huddled in some bomb shelter somewhere looking out only for myself.  I would rather die for compassion than self preservation.

Unafraid: Alone and Unloved

The Psalmist, no doubt writing from experience, notes "how precious are your thoughts about me, oh Lord."  It's true.  Like a wholly loving parent sees their child with eyes of unconditional love, so God sees us similarly.  Truly owning this foundation makes an enormous difference in our lives because it means that our value and worth are secure - untouchable - regardless of what others might have to say about it.  I hope you are growing in your owning of this truth.

It is really, really important to love and be loved in return (queue Nature Boy by Nat King Cole or Natalie).  This morning, I had the congregation do an exercise toward this end.  We gathered around tables to share and listen.  I encourage you to do this with those you love, to make sure you are staying closely connected.  Make it fodder for dinner conversation or coffee.  Love the one sharing enough o give them your full attention.  Love the ones listening to you enough to share who you really are.

Enjoy!

Ten Excellent Questions

1.What are you passionate about?

2.If I really knew you, what would I know about you?

3.What makes you feel the most fulfilled?

4.Who is your personal hero?

5.What is your dream job?

6.What is your biggest accomplishment?

7.What’s on your bucket list this year?

8.How would you want to be remembered?

9.If you could master one new skill, what would it be?

10.What would your perfect day look like?

Unafraid: Meaninglessness

This teaching is part of an ongoing series on approaching our fears with faith based in part on Adam Hamilton’s book, Unafraid.

Recently, I was having a conversation with my son, Noah, and one of his friends, Paul, who just graduated from college and is about to begin his career in accounting.  It was pretty late, and the conversation turned to deeper concerns.  “I have a friend who is working in her field and she doesn’t really like it.  It’s not at all what she thought the work was going to be like.  What if I find out that I hate this work but am stuck for the next 40 years doing something I can’t stand?  It seems meaningless!  What do we do if that happens?”

Paul certainly isn’t alone.  In fact, I would hunch that he speaks for his generation that has been encouraged to pursue a vocation that fits with one’s passion so as to avoid that meaningless existence of mundane drudgery.  I remember the youth pastor in my first church clued me in to the difference between our generations.  My generation was still pretty focused on a “living to work” paradigm where we were driven to identify ourselves with our work, and success in life was closely tied to success at work.  Not him.  He worked to live.  He wanted to do well, but his identity or sense of success was not tied to his work.  I’ve spoken to parents who wonder why their adult kids don’t get a job.  The answer they get is that they are waiting for a job that fits their passion, even if it means living really stretched financially in the meantime.  They don’t want to fritter away their lives in meaningless hours working at something they don’t have any passion for.

My generation and before do struggle with this hopeless meaninglessness fear, but too often the lightbulb doesn’t come on until late in life, sometimes well into retirement.  In their later years they recognize that the pursuits of work and wealth as vehicles for meaning in life are overrated and likely won’t deliver.  I’ve officiated a number of funerals where the beloved deceased put all their eggs into their retirement basket, only to have their life cut short well before their dreams were even attempted, let alone realized.  It is easy to feel like life is pointless during those seasons.

There is a book in the Bible dedicated to this human struggle for meaningful life: Ecclesiastes.  Written by King David’s son from his ill-gotten wife, Bathsheba,  Solomon was known for two things: wisdom and wealth.  At the dawn of his reign, he had a pivotal spiritual experience:

God appeared to Solomon and said, “What do you want? Ask, and I will give it to you!”
     Solomon replied to God, “You showed faithful love to David, my father, and now you have made me king in his place. O Lord God, please continue to keep your promise to David my father, for you have made me king over a people as numerous as the dust of the earth! Give me the wisdom and knowledge to lead them properly, for who could possibly govern this great people of yours?”
     God said to Solomon, “Because your greatest desire is to help your people, and you did not ask for wealth, riches, fame, or even the death of your enemies or a long life, but rather you asked for wisdom and knowledge to properly govern my people— I will certainly give you the wisdom and knowledge you requested. But I will also give you wealth, riches, and fame such as no other king has had before you or will ever have in the future!” – 2 Chronicles 1:7-12 (NLT)

God was faithful to deliver.  No king of Israel before or after commanded anywhere near the same level of power and wealth as Solomon.  And for wisdom?  Rulers from other parts of the world came to sit and learn from him.  One source estimates that he was the 5th richest human being of all time.  His estimated net worth was $2.2 Trillion, which is roughly 1.5 times the net worth of Bill Gates, John Astor, Henry Ford, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Norman Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie combined.  Pretty successful guy.  And yet, deep into his life, he lamented in his reflections:

“Everything is meaningless,” says the Teacher, “completely meaningless!”
     What do people get for all their hard work under the sun? Generations come and generations go, but the earth never changes. The sun rises and the sun sets, then hurries around to rise again. The wind blows south, and then turns north. Around and around it goes, blowing in circles. Rivers run into the sea, but the sea is never full. Then the water returns again to the rivers and flows out again to the sea. Everything is wearisome beyond description. No matter how much we see, we are never satisfied. No matter how much we hear, we are not content.
     History merely repeats itself. It has all been done before. Nothing under the sun is truly new. Sometimes people say, “Here is something new!” But actually it is old; nothing is ever truly new. We don’t remember what happened in the past, and in future generations, no one will remember what we are doing now. – Ecclesiastes 1:1-11 (NLT)

For twelve chapters Solomon considers human existence and determines that it is all meaningless.  Wealth.  Work. Meaningless.  He surprises (especially) Baptist teetotalers with his words of advice which he states a number of times throughout his little book: in light of our meaninglessness, you might as well eat, drink, and be merry.  Cheers!

In his book, Unafraid, Adam Hamilton tackles the commonly held fear of meaninglessness head on.  He cites Victor Frankl a number of times, who survived the torment of being held in a holocaust prison camp.  Frankl noticed that some prisoners despaired while others seemed to prevail through the same experience.  He came to believe that “life is never made unbearable by circumstances, but only by lack of meaning and purpose” (Unafraid, 99).  Especially when things are not good – even evil – there is an opportunity for us to find and create meaning from them.

Meaning is something we have the capacity to find and create, apparently regardless of the circumstance.  This is an important insight to consider for all people of every age who find themselves in this existential struggle. It means that there is hope even if we’re stuck in a job that might not be as awesome as we’d hoped, or a situation we wouldn’t wish on our worst enemy.  Apparently, according to Frankl, to stay stuck in the despair of meaninglessness is a choice, as is the freedom to live with meaning no matter what.  I find that very hopeful.

So, how do we pull it off?  How do we find meaning and even happiness in every situation?  Frankl noted in the preface to the 1992 edition of his book, Man’s Search for Meaning: “for success, like happiness, cannot be pursued; it must ensue, and it only does so as the unintended side-effect of one’s dedication to a cause greater than oneself or as the byproduct of one’s surrender to a person other than oneself. Happiness must happen by not caring about it.  I want you to listen to what your conscience commands you to do and go on to carry it out to the best of your knowledge. Then you will live to see that in the long run – in the long run, I say! – success will follow you precisely because you had forgotten to think of it.”  Meaning, satisfaction, and happiness ultimately stem from serving a cause greater than ourselves. 

Jesus taught this (Matthew 16:24-28).  He noted that the surest way to lose your life was to serve yourself, and the greatest way to insure that you keep it is to lose it in the Way Jesus taught.  That Way was what living in deep relationship with God looked like, which invariably included loving and serving those around us, standing up for those who are being robbed of true shalom (oppression).  Hamilton notes (103), “According to Jesus, our daily lives are meant to be lived in the rhythm of accepting and reciprocating God’s love, loving our neighbors, and pursuing God’s will in tangible ways.  Loving our neighbors does not mean having warm, fuzzy feelings for them. It means… ‘to do justice, love kindness, and walk humbly with God’ (Micah 6:8).”

Hamilton incorporates a daily ritual into his life to remind him of this critical secret to experience meaning and lasting joy in life.  He begins his day with a prayer: “Thank you, God, for today. Thank you for your love and grace. I offer myself once more to you today. Please help me to be mindful of those around me. Use me to bless, encourage, and show kindness to all that I meet today. Send me on your mission today” (104). He does this so that he doesn’t miss out on what is before him all the time.  “Meaningful and significant lives are lived moment by moment – as we pay attention to the world around us, as we give thanks to God from whom all of life is a gift, as we look for the simple and selfless ways that we can love and serve others while positively impacting our world. It is both an attitude of the heart and a rhythm of daily actions that affect us as much as we affect others” (Hamilton, 105).

Paul and Noah had this figured out already.  Now it’s up to them to put it into practice and realize the power of this secret.  What about Solomon,  though?  Did the wisest man that ever lived miss the memo that his Jewish tradition conveyed?  What’s with the eat, drink, and be merry bit that he commended to his readers so many times in his brief tome?

Perhaps the conclusion to his writing was an editorial addition long after he died.  Or, perhaps there is a connection between the Way of Jesus, “eat, drink, and be merry”, and “fearing God, obeying God’s commands”.  I think there is.  To fear is to revere, to respect, to follow much more than cower.  It means to deeply value with your life, as if it is the most important thing to give your attention.  In that sense, to savor every moment is deeply honoring to God.  Given the broader context of Solomon’s writing in Ecclesiastes, and the even broader context of his Proverbs, we must assume that this is no selfish pursuit, but communal. One where there can be no merriment if someone is left outside while we eat and drink.  Just as there is no justice for any unless there is justice for all, perhaps the same is true for merriment.

Feeling like your life is meaningless?  Love someone.  Serve a cause bigger than you.  Help someone’s shalom come to fruition.  Break bread.  Raise a glass.  Pursue merriment with all.  You’ll find yourself surrounded by meaning that connects you deeply to the One Who connects us all.

Questions to think about…

1.       When do you first remember wondering if life was pointless? How did you resolve it?

2.       When has life felt most meaningful to you? When has life felt most meaningless to you?

3.       Have you ever experienced meaningfulness during awful seasons of life?

4.       How has Jesus’ approach to saving your life worked for you?  How have you experienced losing your life by trying to save it?  How have you experienced keeping your life by losing yourself in the Way of Jesus?

5.       What practices do you use to keep your perspective, which promotes meaningfulness?

Unafraid: Desperate to Please (Disappointing Others)

This teaching is part of an ongoing series on approaching our fears with faith based in part on Adam Hamilton’s book, Unafraid.

Most people struggle with the fear of disappointing others.  We are born to parents who we look to for love and comfort.  We naturally want to please them – we can’t help it.  Sometimes, however, this natural desire gets off track in one way or another.  For some, disappointing others is of no concern whatsoever, to the point that they believe, say, and do whatever they want, however they want.  In some cases this leads to a lot of carnage in the wake of social media rants, poor conversations, and blatant hurtful acts.  For others, the fear of disappointing others pushes them in the other direction, and they become people pleasers.  Take two minutes and enjoy this video by Riley Armstrong and see if it reminds you of someone you know (hint: that someone may be you!).  A recent post from Psychology Today offers ten signs that identify people pleasers:  

1.       You pretend to agree with everyone.

2.       You feel responsible for how other people feel.

3.       You apologize often.

4.       You feel burdened by the things you have to do.

5.       You can’t say no.

6.       You feel uncomfortable if someone is angry at you.

7.       You act like the people around you.

8.       You need praise to feel good.

9.       You go to great lengths to avoid conflict.

10.   You don’t admit when your feelings are hurt.

Screenshot_20180514-091548.jpg

So, where do you and in all of this?  Are you more on the sociopath end of the spectrum or the people-pleasing doormat side?  Sometimes our behavior is rooted in childhood experiences, as Adam Hamilton notes (Unafraid, 94):

 

When the disappointment is not false…  In a bit, we’ll get to some helpful stuff to help alleviate your fear of disappointing others.  Right now, though, let’s be completely honest.  There are times we’ve disappointed others because we have messed up.  We have been perfectly imperfectly human and have disturbed the peace.  We do this.  We blow it.  Sometimes with intent, often unwittingly.  When we are guilty of disturbing shalom, this is what the Bible refers to as sin.  Sometimes we sin against others.  When we do, we need to address it.  We need to own our behavior, sincerely apologize as quickly as possible, ask forgiveness, and do our best to move forward with that relationship restored to its appropriate place.  Note: this applies to most relationships we find ourselves in.  In some really awful situations, seek counsel before entering this process, because engaging the person and seeking peace in the way described might actually be unhealthy and unsafe.  Most of the time, however, we need to humble ourselves as seek restoration.  This is the Jesus Way to go (see Matthew 5:21-26).

Sometimes, the greatest person we have disappointed is ourselves.  Most of the time, the perfect ideal we hold ourselves to (which we can never meet) results in us being disappointed with ourselves.  Sometimes, however, we do things we can’t believe ourselves capable of doing.  We may be able to get our brain around all of the contributing factors that led to our behavior, but we still did what we did, and we struggle to get over it.  We need to forgive ourselves.  God is an immediate forgiver – granting grace before we ask for forgiveness (see John 8:1-11).  If God forgives you, don’t you think it’s time you forgive yourself?  Grace is what you need.  Perhaps you need to read philosopher and theologian Paul Tillich’s words slowly and meditate on them for a while (Unafraid, 97):

Screenshot_20180514-092027.jpg

You are accepted.  You may feel awful about your behavior.  Grace means it need not define you.  It is part of your story – no call for living in denial here – but let it teach you and propel you forward rather than simply act as weight to sink you to the depths of despair.  Build your identity on these words offered by the Apostle Paul (Ephesians 2:4-5): “God is rich in mercy.  He brought us to life with Christ while we were dead as a result of those things we did wrong.  He did this because of the great love he has for us. You are saved by God’s grace!” Saved literally means to be healed, to be made well and whole.  By the way, this is a process that takes time and repetition.

Okay, so, what can we do to disturb shalom less?  What can we learn from Jesus about disappointing others?

First, realize that Jesus seriously disappointed people.  Yep.  By the droves.  If he was the anointed one so full of the Spirit of God and he disappointed others, just take a reality pill and realize that we will, too.  It is unavoidable.  But you can embrace the way of Jesus which will help you feel more okay about it.

Especially in our present context that is so heavily impacted by social media usage, we are able to offend faster than ever!  Sometimes anonymously, which is even more dangerous than not.  Yelp reviews, product reviews, Tweets and Facebook posts give us a platform to vomit our opinion effortlessly.  As we consider how we are engaging others, however, we may need to seriously consider Hamilton’s question that he posits to seminary students learning to preach (Unafraid, 92): is our goal merely to irritate people, or is it to influence people?  If we want the latter, there is some intentionality required.  Hamilton offers some key texts that offer insight and advice as to how to proceed (Unafraid, 92):

Screenshot_20180514-091639.jpg

Taken together, these scriptures provide some great, golden goals for how to live with the comfort of knowing we’ve been true to the Way of Jesus, which is also being true to our True Selves – who we are really created to be as individuals and in community.  It’s our best hope. Adopting these behaviors and integrating them into practice might be challenging.  If we’re on the sociopathic end of the spectrum, speaking truth with love will feel like a real burden: “I have to be nice?” (see Ephesians 4:14-16).  If we are on the doormat end, this way may require serious courage: “I can say ‘no’ or disagree?”

Life is challenging.  Not paying any attention to the Way of Jesus will result in challenges.  Following the Way of Jesus will bring you face to face with challenges as well.  One is tied to the source of Life itself, while the other – as it perpetuates isolation from others, our True Self, and God – will lead to greater despair.  This challenging Way of Jesus is worth it, even if it does – and it does – require courage.  Criticism will come, as it surely did for Jesus.  As Hamilton notes, “Courage… is not the elimination of fear. Courage is doing what we know we should do in the face of rejection – choosing not to give up in the face of criticism.  And grace is the truth that when others are disappointed, even when [we’ve] truly blown it, there is One whose love and acceptance remains steadfast (Unafraid, 98).”

Building on grace as our foundation – that we are inherently and unconditionally loved by God – we can live and grow as real human beings.  This means we can let go of our need to be perfect, because we never will be.  This does mean we strive toward Christ-likeness, where we find the greatest expression of life.  It means we really, deeply own our dust-divine dance, our experience of being fully human yet infused by the Spirit of God.  With this, we have the humble freedom to truly, increasingly live, sleeping well at night even as we don’t please everyone all the time, disappointing as that might be to some.  That’s reality.  We learn.  We grow.  We become. We live in grace and promote it.  Real life.

Unafraid: What if I fail?

This teaching is part of an ongoing series on approaching our fears with faith based in part on Adam Hamilton’s book, Unafraid.

FEAR: False Expectations Appearing Real

Changing the position of one character can make all the difference.  Hold onto that for later.

In this chapter, Adam Hamilton tackles the fear of failure.  Some people are so afraid to fail that it limits their lives in ways they may not appreciate.  He notes that “if you always choose the risk-free, completely safe, and convenient path in life, you find the failure you experience is the failure to truly live” (84).  J.K. Rowling agrees with him: “It is impossible to live without failing something” (84).  Hamilton cites Moses as an example of one who lived decades playing it safe, and when called upon to change, gave God a long list of reasons why he shouldn’t go – send my brother Aaron instead! 

To help calm our fears of failing, Hamilton offered three words of advice that may provide some comfort as we face into this fear.  First, he notes that most things are never as hard as you fear they will be.  Even if we fail, the pain almost never ends of being as painful as we imagine is might be.  The second word is from a leadership course he took: successful people are willing to do the things that unsuccessful people are unwilling to do.  This undoubtedly means facing down fears and just doing what needs to be done.  Finally, the third word encourages us to consider “discernment by nausea” – the decision that we likely should take is the one that may be causing us the most angst. 

I can speak from experience that his words bring some wisdom to the table.  When the recession hit in 2008 and our home’s property value tanked, we were a bit worked up about the future.  What if we lose our house?  What will we do?  As we processed this out, however, we realized that we were being extremely creative in our exaggerated worst-case-scenario imagination.  We catastrophized.  We gained a lot of peace realizing that the worst thing that would potentially happen to us would be entirely survivable.  Not pleasant, but not a horror film in the making, either.  When I was in college (and again in seminary), I found myself at a crossroads where I needed to face my fears and do some work I really didn’t want to do.  Doing the work, however, was the only thing that would alleviate my fear of being absolutely broke!  Finally, some of the best decisions of my life were riddled with anxiety.  Big decisions with big consequences bring up a lot of anxiety, even if we know it’s a good decision.  I knew I was in love with my fiancé, and that we were a great match with a strong likelihood of success.  The day before and the day of the wedding, I was nervous.  Did that mean I was making the wrong decision?  No!  It means I was making a decision that would affect everyday for the rest of my life.  There should be butterflies even if intellectually we are confident.  The first car we bought, the first house we bought, the first (and second) baby we learned would be joining us, the moves we’ve made – all brought butterflies.  I think there is this false idea that if it’s a really good decision we will be “at peace.”  Sometimes.  But our lives reflect the experiences of life seen in the Bible, where big invitations to follow God were met with vomit.  For sure.  Feeling at peace or comfortable is not necessarily the measure of a good or right decision.

Hamilton’s counsel is helpful, practical advice for managing inevitable fears that come with life.  As I reflected on this chapter and its relevance to my life, I found a deeper current that needed to be addressed and expressed. Of all the chapters in the book, this is the one that messes with me most.  I don’t want to fail on a number of different measures.  As I think about how often I face the fear of failure along one facet or another, I can honestly say that this is a daily struggle.  The failure I fear most bothers me a lot because it is not the most important thing I value.  It is at best a distant fifth behind my relationships with God, my wife, my children, and my extended family and close friends.  Way distant.  This fifth concern is related to my work.

Cognitively, I can tell you that who I am is not what I do for a living.  I can swear to you that I know that I do not control all the variables that result in whether or not I am successful.  I have used a good amount of energy encouraging colleagues in pastoral ministry to recognize that the way success is defined in our culture cannot be the sole measure for how we define success in ministry.  And yet I am plagued with it just the same.  And so are most men in our country.  Perhaps the underlying fear is being incompetent – a failure – which we might evaluate as inadequate work performance, weak financial position, a smaller home than someone else’s, a lesser car than someone else is driving.  For me, I am constantly reminded from our culture that bigger is better in every respect, that growth is everything, regardless of how it happens.  For churches, that means growing attendance and financial contributions.  Every time I hear about a mega church – our cultural model of complete success – I am reminded that by such standards, I suck.  In fact, I have managed to be so controversial at times that it has resulted in a reduction of attendance – I don’t just suck, I lead the pack in suckiness!  Think of it: I have all the gifts, the look, the skillset to be the picture of all that mega church leadership requires, and yet I have found myself doing the opposite of the mega church playbook.  Don’t let the doctorate fool you – maybe I’m actually really, really stupid!  I’m the guy that when things are looking good, I do a teaching questioning the doctrine of hell, or declare equality for the LGBTQ community, which most Christians don’t agree with.  Instead of growing the church, I have used my wonderful skills to do the opposite!  By so many cultural measures, I am a failure.  I am acutely aware of this reality, and it kills me.  The unfortunate thing is that this expectation and connection between identity and career success is a culturally-derived phenomenon.  And it is false.  It is easy for men to feel like a failure when the culture itself has rigged the game so that feeling like a failure is inevitable.

Women have suffered similarly but along different lines the culture has created.  In the United States, 70% of men, when they see themselves naked, feel pretty good about what they see.  For women, the number drops to 40%.  I think that’s high.  How the culture has shaped how women are “supposed” to look has created untold levels of stress and shame without any recognition that the standard changes from generation to generation.  According to Brene Brown, an additional and equally severe fear revolves around the issue of motherhood.  There is cultural pressure on women to have kids that men do not share.  There is shaming women face regarding fertility that men simply do not. Once a woman has a kid, a no-win double bind scenario unfolds.  If the woman chooses to stay home to be more present with their children, they are looked down upon for not being better examples for girls of the world who are trying to be equals in the marketplace and science labs around the world – they are letting their gender down.  If they choose to work after their kids are born, what kind of mother are they, then?  Heartless?  Why did you have kids in the first place?  You’re a monster!  It is easy for women to fear failure when the culture itself has rigged it so that feeling like a failure is inevitable.

Hamilton’s advice helps us manage along to some degree, but I think there is also a deeper issue that, once resolved and continually supported leads to an alleviation of fear at a core level, which leads to greater peace and less fear.

Scared or sacred?  I caught a typo too late last week that my spellcheck could not catch.  The question was supposed to read, “Are you scared?”  Instead, it said, “are you sacred?”  I think how we answer the latter question makes a massive difference on the former.  When we identify ourselves by our God-createdness – as sacred, truly special, one-of-a-kind,  magnificent, one-measure-does-not-fit-all orientation, things change.  When God’s voice is bigger and more frequently listened to than the culture’s, we increasingly hear affirmation, not judgment.  Instead of an ever-shifting foundation which insures failure worth fearing, we find our feet planted on rock, secure enough to build a life upon.

It is this identification with “sacred” that I believe led Paul to be able to say with such experience-born confidence: I have learned how to be content with whatever I have. I know how to live on almost nothing or with everything. I have learned the secret of living in every situation, whether it is with a full stomach or empty, with plenty or little. For I can do everything through Christ, who gives me strength (Philippians 4:11-13, NLT).  This decision to center our lives on who we are in Christ is embracing the sacred and defying the scared.  It is challenging, however, as Jesus noted: Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the road is easy that leads to destruction, and there are many who take it. For the gate is narrow and the road is hard that leads to life, and there are few who find it (Matthew 7:13-14, NRSV).  It’s hard simply because it is not common, not comfy.  Listening to the voice of God requires great intentionality (at least initially) and focus, especially since there are so many voices shouting in our ear encouraging allegiance to the cultural paradigm. 

Are you scared or sacred?  When we choose to focus on our sacred identity, we also find an abiding hope that even our most difficult challenges can be transformed into something good, as Paul notes: We know that all things work together for good for those who love God, who are called according to his purpose (Romans 8:28, NRSV).  As we seek to live fully, found in the Way Jesus lived and believed, we grow in faith that we are part of something bigger than ourselves, something beautiful worth pursuing.  It is a choice to see differently, trust differently, living with an abiding faith that sees us through.  May you discover this as you choose to build your life from a sacred identity.

Unafraid: the Sky if Falling (Politics)

This teaching is part of an ongoing series on approaching our fears with faith based in part on Adam Hamilton’s book, Unafraid.

FEAR: False Expectations Appearing Real

Henny Penny Politics.  The Chicken Little story about how fear has been told in various forms in cultures all over the world since people started telling stories!  The basic (false) idea that we need to be very afraid of impending doom is one that our political system has capitalized on increasingly for especially the last 25-30 years.  The strategic decision to focus on why we should be afraid of voting for the other candidate instead of proclaiming all the good reasons to consider the one paying for the ad is simple.  As Rick Wilson, Republican political strategist and media consultant points out, “Fear is the simplest emotion to tweak in a campaign ad.  You associate your opponent with terror, with fear, with crime, with causing pain and uncertainty” (Unafraid, 75).  When deciding how to get the most bang you’re your campaign bucks, fear is the most cost-effective – and the most effective, period – approach.

A very odd thing happens when we are directed toward fear.  I would have thought that when faced with a startling statement that sounds “off” in some way yet triggers our fears, we would be inclined to dig into the issue to discover what is really happening beneath the surface.  Not the case. “When people are anxious, they tend to seek out information from sources that actually reinforce their anxiety. We can see footage from the latest terrorist act over and over and over again on twenty-four-hour news. We don’t tend to look for the sources that say ‘they chances of this happening in your community are one in 3.6 billion’” (Adam Hamilton referencing Dr. Shana Gadarian, Anxious Politics: Democaratic Citizenship in a Threatening World).  Note to self: realize that this is, apparently, our built-in system.  When triggered, we will need to force ourselves into another mode that takes us toward greater understanding.

Additionally, knowing that we are inclined to pay most attention to sources that affirm our beliefs, we need to become fully aware of the biases our sources themselves hold.  Take a moment to look at this chart which seeks to identify where various news sources come down in terms of their leanings:

MW-GE557_MediaB_20180228115701_NS.jpg

What is your reaction to the chart?  Hogwash?  Insightful?  A mixture of both?  At minimum, I hope it reminds you that wherever your favorite source is, there are other voices speaking into issues.  Hearing multiple perspectives leads to greater understanding.  I hope you will adopt Adam Hamitlon’s goal of listening to a wide range of voices so that you do not find yourself in an echo chamber ringing out your own opinion with no regard or knoweldge of those held by others.

I have mentioned many times before that we live in a time when our rhetoric leads us toward binary thinking where everything is either/or, black/white, true/false, liberal/conservative regardless of the complexity of the issue being addressed.  In the church world, I am generally referred to as “liberal” because of my stance on issues related to equality regardless of gender, race, legal status, and sexual orientation.  I’m used to it.  It came as a great surprise when my wife and I were with good friends who are not part of the church world at all and they referred to us as conservative (even though they know and appreciate our stance on social issues).  What?!  Nobody’s ever called me that!  This served as a reminder to me that where we place ourselves on whatever spectrum is heavily impacted by the context in which we are viewed.  Adam Hamilton offers a helpful insight regarding how limiting binary thinking is related to the use of the liberal/conservative label: “To be liberal means, in the best sense, to be open to new ideas, open to reform, respectful of individual rights, and generous. To be conservative, in the best sense, means to hold to traditional values and ideas, exercising appropriate caution when faced with change.  If we are liberal without any conserving impulse, we become unmoored, jettisoning important truths and values simply because they are old.  (I’m reminded of something a professor once said to me: ‘All that is old may not be gold, but all that is new may not be true.’) If we are conservative without a liberal impulse, we become intransigent, unwilling to reform or embrace change” (Adam Hamilton, Unafraid, 76).

We need to be constantly aware that we are hardwired to differentiate ourselves from others – it’s baked into our cake.  What we do with it is our responsibility.  Our faith tradition offers many stories of what some people did with this reality – some blew it while others moved salvation/peace/health-for-all forward.  There are also many passages of scripture from both the Christian and Jewish tradition from whence it came that offer counsel regarding how we speak to others.  Let’s take a look…

In the second chapter of Acts we find the story of a particular Feast of Pentecost that went beyond what Jesus’ followers could have anticipated.  This was the most-attended Jewish Feast in Jerusalem at that time in history, when throngs of the Jewish faithful would converge on their beloved city to recount the giving of the Law which informed their faith and ethic.  God had more to give, apparently, as the Holy Spirit came onto the scene and into many people with grand sci-fi fanfare.  This was unprecedented and entirely unexpected.  The popular belief was that the Holy Spirit was reserved for a very select few, not broadcast to many.  Jews and converts to Judaism were there from all over the known world, and the Spirit enabled the disciples to speak in other languages (or at least heard in other languages).  This dawning of a new age of understanding was predicted by Jesus.  When it happened, it further validated Jesus and his message, which empowered the disciples to move forward with tremendous, surprising courage.  Peter preached mightily to the gathered audience and thousands came to believe in Jesus and his message.  A new day dawned, indeed!  At the end of the chapter, we get a picture of a healthy community of faith:

They committed themselves to the teaching of the apostles, the life together, the common meal, and the prayers.

43-45 Everyone around was in awe—all those wonders and signs done through the apostles! And all the believers lived in a wonderful harmony, holding everything in common. They sold whatever they owned and pooled their resources so that each person’s need was met.

46-47 They followed a daily discipline of worship in the Temple followed by meals at home, every meal a celebration, exuberant and joyful, as they praised God. People in general liked what they saw. Every day their number grew as God added those who were saved.

The way the disciples handled strange new unfamiliar things did not lead toward divisiveness – even though some were provoking it.  Instead, the end result at this point of their journey was inclusivity in seemingly every way, and respect by the surrounding community.  We need more of that.

Reflecting on this chapter of early church history and others, I can confidently say that most of the big breakthroughs that happened in the development of the early church did not come as a result of proactive, thoughtful decision-making (to include Samaritans and all other races and eventually let go of nearly all Jewish legalism in favor of the Way of Jesus which served to embody them all).  Nope.  These issues were thrust upon them.  Once they realized that had to deal with these issues, the early church leaders passionately deliberated and fervently prayed even as they vehemently disagreed with each other.  This has been the pattern ever since the end of the first century where the biblical text ends.  God continues to breathe into us, stretching us, inviting us to passionately deliberate and fervently pray through issues around which we vehemently disagree.  The invitation is not to bury our heads in the sand and hope all the issues go away.  The invitation is to be part of what God is doing to bring healing and hope to the world.  To pull this off requires a different approach to issues than the prevailing cultural system around us  (especially regarding politics).  We are invited into a higher standard which impacts how we choose to behave even as we may be struggling with fear and anxiety about a number of issues.  Civility is unfortunately rare in public discourse.  We are invited to bring it back.  As Brene Brown notes in her book, Braving the Wilderness:

Screenshot_20180430-180931.jpg

What Brown is encouraging is uncomfortable.  We may be much more comfy sitting on the sidelines and just let bullies rant until they run out of steam.  We will silently pray for them – what’s the harm in that?  As Elie Weisel, survivor of a Nazi prison camp notes, “We must always take sides.  Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.”  Especially for those of us who are privileged (even if we don’t believe it), we are invited and compelled and commanded to act for those who do not enjoy our privilege.  I am a highly educated, tall, blue-eyed, white man of Dutch/German descent.  In our culture, I am nearly at the top of the food chain.  The only things that would put me even higher would be lots more money and more Twitter followers…  Coming to grips with what God is trying to do in the world –  which is what Jesus did do in the world – begs the question: what am I invited to do as a Jesus follower?  How can I speak into this world with love and grace all with the hopes of bringing healing and hope for all?

I end this teaching with Adam Hamilton, again, who ended his chapter with the following:

“We must speak up, stand up, and work for what is right and just.  But when we’ve done all we can in pursuit of what is right, we have to release our concerns to God.  I don’t believe God dictates the outcome of elections, or is pushing buttons and pulling strings in our national politics.  God allows individuals and nations to do foolish and sometimes evil things that are the opposite of his will.  But God has a way of working through the evil around us and those who participate in it or advocate for it. God specializes in forcing good from evil, of bending the foolishness of humans to accomplish a higher purpose. Trusting this helps me to feel hopeful about the future of our nation” (Unafraid, 80).

Check out these helpful resources…

Bible verses that speak into how we speak…

What the Bible says about communicating with each other. Here a just a few:

Romans 12:18-21 The Message (MSG)

17-19 Don’t hit back; discover beauty in everyone. If you’ve got it in you, get along with everybody. Don’t insist on getting even; that’s not for you to do. “I’ll do the judging,” says God. “I’ll take care of it.”

20-21 Our Scriptures tell us that if you see your enemy hungry, go buy that person lunch, or if he’s thirsty, get him a drink. Your generosity will surprise him with goodness. Don’t let evil get the best of you; get the best of evil by doing good.

Proverbs 31:8-9 The Message (MSG)

8-9 “Speak up for the people who have no voice,
    for the rights of all the down-and-outers.
Speak out for justice!
    Stand up for the poor and destitute!”

Philippians 4:5 The Message (MSG)

4-5 Celebrate God all day, every day. I mean, revel in him! Make it as clear as you can to all you meet that you’re on their side, working with them and not against them.

Ephesians 4:29 The Message (MSG)

29 Watch the way you talk. Let nothing foul or dirty come out of your mouth. Say only what helps, each word a gift.

Colossians 3:8-11 The Message (MSG)

But you know better now, so make sure it’s all gone for good: bad temper, irritability, meanness, profanity, dirty talk.

9-11 Don’t lie to one another. You’re done with that old life. It’s like a filthy set of ill-fitting clothes you’ve stripped off and put in the fire. Now you’re dressed in a new wardrobe. Every item of your new way of life is custom-made by the Creator, with his label on it. All the old fashions are now obsolete. Words like Jewish and non-Jewish, religious and irreligious, insider and outsider, uncivilized and uncouth, slave and free, mean nothing. From now on everyone is defined by Christ, everyone is included in Christ.

Politically Speaking…

In general, we stink at listening.  Just admit it.  All too often we are formulating what we are going to say while they are talking, which means we miss much of what they are saying.  Active listening is really, really needed for healthy relationships, and desperately needed in our culture that seems to settle for binary, simplistic responses to complex issues.  If we could learn to really understand another’s perspective and even choose to go in with the hope to learn something, we might enjoy actual dialogue instead of a Tweet-off.  Ask someone you know who might think differently than you and ask some of these questions.  Choose to listen so carefully that you could accurately express their opinion back to them if asked.  Listening with respectful engagement is perhaps our first and biggest step toward progress on this front.

Questions:

•       "What do you think of the building the wall and why?"

•       "What do you think about immigration and why?"

•       "What do you think about Russian involvement in our election and why?"

•       "What do you think about our justice system and why?"

•       "What is you opinion on on racism in the USA and why?"

•       "What do you think about gun control and why?"

•       "What do you think about the women’s march after the election? Why?"

•       "What do you think about the young people marching on Washington?"

Process the following questions on your own, paying attention to how you feel when others have opinions that differ from yours.  

•       Are you able to stay in a loving space?

•       Are you able to be open to possible influence?

•       Are you sacred?

•       Do you want to argue?  Leave?  Judge the other as stupid or naive or…?

Becoming aware of your feelings in these situations helps us come to grips with underlying bias and fear that we hold which may get in the way.

Unafraid: Weaponizing Fear (Terrorism)

This teaching is part of an ongoing series on approaching our fears with faith based in part on Adam Hamilton’s book, Unafraid.

This week we are going to tackle a fear that contemporary Americans have been forced to reckon with since September 11, 2001: terrorism. While we have seen plenty of violence before that day and since, terrorism became up close and personal that day, and also provided a new face to add to our list of suspicious persons: anyone who looked vaguely Middle Eastern.  While we will look squarely at terrorism, there is significant carryover from last week’s look at racism, because they both involve fear of the other: xenophobia acts as an undercurrent we may not recognize.

Recall the acronym we’ve been using for FEAR: False Expectations Appearing Real.  What do we expect regarding terrorism on our soil?  How has terrorism messed with us?  Recall also Hamilton’s sort-of-acronym’ish process for addressing our fears: Face your fears with faith. Examine your assumptions in light of the facts. Attack your anxieties with action. Release your cares to God.  We’ll work through this stuff and move in an important direction as well.

Faith in what/who we call God means that we live with an abiding belief that the nature of the created world is essentially good since it reflects a good, creative God/Spirit/Presence/Force.  This means that when we face terror, we enter into the process believing that humanity is overwhelmingly very good as God declares in Genesis’ first creation story.  With very few exceptions, people from all tribes and walks of life want to live a full, meaningful life.  Sure, twisted thinking and mental health issues can steer us in awful directions on an individual, communal, national and global level, but that should not detract us from the current of reality as being good and naturally flowing toward renewal.  This is the Perennial Tradition in action – believing that even death itself is not the end but the necessary step before renewal/resurrection.  That’s facing fears with faith.

With faith as our foundation, let’s look at some facts.  In short, statistically speaking, we have little reason to live in fear of terrorist activity given where we live.  As you can see for yourself on this statistical storymap  highlighting terrorist activity from known groups, nothing is happening in  the United States that qualifies as terrorist activity this year.  There has been plenty of activity globally, but mostly in areas where we know there are ongoing conflicts – Colombia, sub-Saharan Africa, and the Middle East, especially.  ISIS has our attention perhaps more than any other terrorist group in the United States.  In 2017, they claimed responsibility for the deaths of 1,670.  Only 29 of those were European or American (1.7%), and 95% of the victims were Muslims living in Islamic countries (Unafraid, 65). 

Hamilton notes that since 9/11, there have been 10 terrorist attacks on American soil claiming the lives of 94 people (49 of those in one attack), which is awful and tragic.  During that same time period, however, 9,600 people in the United States died by lightning strike.  You are 120 times more likely to get struck by lightning than to be killed by an Islamic terrorist, 2,000 times more likely to be murdered by an American who is not an Islamic terrorist, and 7,000 times more likely to die in a car accident (Unafraid, 67).  While it is good, wise, and our duty as citizens to be aware and report behavior that seems suspicious, in all likelihood our fears about this happening to us in the United States – let alone Napa Valley – are extremely remote.

A greater thing to fear may be where our skewed perspective might take us.  It is an all-to-easy short step for people to associate Islamic terrorism with Islam and all Muslims who practice that faith.  Because the terrorists refer to select verses in the Quran to make the case for their violent behavior toward those who do not share their faith, many people assume that the religion itself is bent on violence.  Add to that fact that most Muslim people are not white, speak different languages than us, dress differently and eat different food than we do and we have all kinds of reasons to be suspicious.  The truth is that there are verses in the Quran that could be used to justify violence if taken literally and without regard to context.  The same is true of the Bible.  Poor scholarship, and an unchecked hermeneutic (how we understand and apply the Bible) can lead to awful outcomes, regardless of religion.  But to paint all Muslims with a terrorist brush would be the same as painting all Christians with a Ku Klux Klan brush, who I view as Christian terrorists.  Furthermore, it is possible for someone to make a case that the Christian religion has been used to justify far more killing than any other faith tradition.  Yet I believe Christianity is about peace, grace, and love.  I bet there are folks in the world that wouldn’t believe me no matter how hard I plead my case, simply because I’m a Christian.  I am suspect because of the hateful actions of more than a few throughout history.  So is the United States given our fuzzy identity as a Christian nation.  As Hamilton discovered, many in the Middle East believe the United States created ISIS to cause infighting and division within the Muslim world (Unafraid, 65).

We need to be aware of our propensity to easily vilify others who don’t look like us and thereafter cannot be trusted.  A great supporting example of this reality in the United States comes from WWII.  There were a handful of POW camps that housed German soldiers during the war.  After Pearl Harbor, based entirely out of fear, the United States forced thousands of US citizens of Japanese descent into internment camps.  Which of these two groups of imprisoned people do you think received better treatment?  The legal citizens who did not look like the majority of Americans (white), or the enemies of State who looked like most Americans?  We don’t fear those who look like us even if they are our sworn enemies.  We do fear those who are not like us even if they pledge allegiance to our flag.  The German POWS thrived with great funding and freedom.  The Japanese Americans suffered in deplorable conditions.  This is what False Expectations Appearing Real can do even in a country that prides itself on freedom and due process.  I bet if Jesus came in the flesh just as he did before – but with contemporary clothes and stuff – we would kill him faster than Rome because of the color of his skin.  This silly video puts it in from of us.

The musical South Pacific stands as a classic show not only because it has great music, a romance, and a lot of comedy.  It has endured because it speaks deeply into the human experience, especially as it relates to how we think about race.  Two storylines emerge where romance and race intersect.  Two faces of racial prejudice emerge as well – a soldier who would never consider marrying the young Islander he’s been sleeping with, and a military nurse who falls for a Frenchman but considers ending things when she discovers that he has two mixed-race kids from his deceased wife.  A brilliant song,  “You Got to be Carefully Taught”, was crafted to express the reality:

You've got to be taught
To hate and fear,
You've got to be taught
From year to year,
It's got to be drummed
In your dear little ear
You've got to be carefully taught.

You've got to be taught to be afraid
Of people whose eyes are oddly made,
And people whose skin is a diff'rent shade,
You've got to be carefully taught

You've got to be taught before it's too late,
Before you are six or seven or eight,
To hate all the people your relatives hate,
You've got to be carefully taught
!

Indeed.  We are born with implicit bias that has protected our species from real threat.  Racism, however, is a learned behavior. The question isn’t whether or not you’ve learned it.  The question is how much have you acquired that you need to intentionally unlearn?

How does our faith inform our actions to “others” who are not like us?   Last week, we looked at Jesus and the church as it emerged. While it struggled to embrace equality across the board, it did so nonetheless, born in response to what it meant to live in the Way of Jesus.  There is no justification for hate, prejudice, or racism in Jesus.  Is that it, then?  Are we as Jesus followers called to passively manage our implicit bias to make sure it doesn’t get out of control and become a xenophobic wildfire?

The story of Philip and the Ethiopian would suggest that we are not called to be passive bystanders, but actually proactive agents of restorative change in the world.  After doing ministry in Samaria (itself a testament to the imperative of grace), Philip sensed from God that he was to take the ministry beyond Palestine, and he took off (Acts 8:26-40).  He came across an Ethiopian eunuch – likely castrated at a young age to make him a more faithful administrator around the Queen’s court.  He was the Kingdom’s treasurer and had been to Jerusalem to worship and was headed back home.  He was reading a scroll from Isaiah chapter 53 when Philip approached him.  They had a long conversation which led to the official deciding to follow Christ and getting baptized.  Philip then left, and the Ethiopian made his way home with his new faith.  It is believed that this was the first convert beyond Palestine, and consequently introduced Northern Africa to Christianity (Candace’s Kingdom rivaled Rome’s Empire in size, strength and power at that time, encompassing most of Northern Africa extending into present day Ethiopia).  The point is that from the beginning there has been an imperative to go into the world with the Good News, not just watch the world from the sidelines.  We are active agents of grace, sent into the world to bring hope and change.  And, by extension, when the world comes to us, we are called to welcome the stranger, not rebuff them.  This is a Jewish principle as well, stated many times in different ways as it shows up here: This is what the Lord says: Be fair-minded and just. Do what is right! Help those who have been robbed; rescue them from their oppressors. Quit your evil deeds! Do not mistreat foreigners, orphans, and widows. Stop murdering the innocent! – Jeremiah 22:3 (NLT)

Anne Waggoner, CrossWalk’s Moderator, served as a missionary in Vietnam.  As a teacher there, she was definitely in the minority.  Yet she prevailed over whatever fears her implicit bias may have encouraged (and that of her family and friends).  Catch her story on the video and podcast of this teaching.

As Jesus followers, it’s time to intentionally work toward the healing of our eyes and the calming of our fears.  Further, it’s time to pray for courage that we might be the agents we are called to be in our world, sticking our neck out for the oppressed wherever they hail from, and welcoming “others” because that is how we have been treated by God.  We love because we have been loved.  So, love.  Love from the comfort of your couch watching bad news that could further divide us. More importantly, love in every interaction everywhere you go as an agent of Jesus who loved you first.

Unafraid: Race

Note: This teaching is part of an ongoing series based in part on Adam Hamilton’s book, Unafraid.

Fear of difference creates a very constricted, exclusive, and small religion and life—the very opposite of the abundance into which God invites us. – Richard Rohr

Adam Hamilton and I grew up in the same neck of the woods – suburban Kansas City.  Being six years older than me, our life experience from our earliest years was very similar.  He grew up in Prairie Village, the suburb where my dad was pastor of Prairie Baptist Church, which enjoyed the vibrancy of being a church in the “new” part of town where all the professionals lived.  Our family lived further out in Overland Park, which is now a sprawling, massive suburb that extends way south of where it used to end.  Like Hamilton, while I grew up in a household that would never tolerate hate speech, I also did not experience much exposure to non-white people.  We had an Asian family at church who became good friends.  Some refugees from Laos.  Down our street lived my brother’s best friend, Billy, who was Filipino.  I can’t remember knowing anyone black my first eight years of life.

To give a concrete expression to the undercurrent of prejudice that existed in the state proud of its Underground Railroad heritage,  Hamilton offered a covenant from one of J.C. Nichols’ housing developments: “None of the said lots shall be conveyed to, used, owned nor occupied by Negroes as owner and tenants.”  Later, the covenant was extended to Jewish people, which meant, of course, that Jesus would not be allowed to live next door…  Racism lived in the community that raised me, written right into the neighborhood HOA.

Let’s get some definitions under our belt about this subject.  Racism is defined as “prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.”  Prejudice is defined as “dislike, hostility, or unjust behavior deriving from unfounded opinions.”  And finally, xenophobia is defined as “intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries.”  Do any of these descriptions describe you?  Lucky for you, there is a very quick, simple test to find out whether or not you are on some level racist, live with prejudice, and struggle to some degree with xenophobia.  Using your middle finger from one hand, place it on the wrist of the opposite hand (or on your jugular vein on your neck) and check for a pulse.  If you have a pulse, you struggle with all three of these things.  How dare I say such a thing about a good person like you?  Because it is human nature.  We are biased toward our own kind.  Interestingly, we are also biased toward the dominant kind of the culture we grew up in.  In the United States, this means there is an implicit bias toward Caucasians.  Move to a part of the world where whites are not dominant, and you will discover that the bias shifts toward the majority.  Calling BS on me?  Take a test from Harvard University that will open your eyes to what you see.

Hamilton suggests that the longest running fear in the Bible revolves around being afraid of “others” who are not like us.  While the story of Cain and Abel certainly is about much more than that, he makes the case that it may point to a division between herdsman who roamed the land feeding their livestock and farmers who tilled the land.  The disdain toward Gentiles (non-Jews) in the Old Testament is easy to find and extends into the New Testament as well.

Jesus’ first sermon poked the racist bear, so to speak, when he clearly spoke about how God’s favor is not exclusive to Jewish people, but extended to non-Jews as well via Israel’s most beloved prophets of old – Elijah and Elisha!  It nearly got him killed.  The sermon provided an allusion to what was ahead for Jesus’ life and teaching.  Above all others, Samaritans were the most loathed by Jewish people.  So, naturally, Jesus went on to befriend a Samaritan woman at a well, and probably his best known parable positioned a “Good Samaritan” as it’s hero while portraying Jewish religious leaders as severely lacking.  Very bold moves toward inclusion.

Peter, one of Jesus’ original disciples and key leader of the early Christian movement struggled with his racism even though he walked with Jesus where he never thought he would.  The account of Peter and Cornelius is a remarkable picture of two people who overcome their prejudice which led to inclusion soon thereafter.  Paul, who had plenty of implicit bias to work out, became a champion of inclusion as he started up church after church all around the Mediterranean from Israel to Rome.  His entire letter to the Roman church was in response to racist-based division between exclusive Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians who wanted a place at the communion table.  His letter to the churches in the region of Galatia  was in response to well-meaning but narrow-minded “Judaizers” who were trying to impose inappropriate laws on inferior Gentiles.  This is where Paul wrote the famous words:

“For you are all children of God through faith in Christ Jesus. And all who have been united with Christ in baptism have put on Christ, like putting on new clothes. There is no longer Jew or Gentile, slave or free, male and female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus. And now that you belong to Christ, you are the true children of Abraham. You are his heirs, and God’s promise to Abraham belongs to you.” – Galatians 3:26-29 (NLT)

These biblical examples serve to illustrate the fact that this human issue of fearing those who are not like us is clearly not new.  What we may not appreciate, however, is that it is still a serious issue here in the United States where we proclaim liberty for all.  It’s still an issue for me and you, even if we can’t admit it.  This is not to say that I believe you’re all a bunch of cross-burning KKK members looking to lynch anybody who isn’t lilly-white and blue-eyed.  What I am saying is that the issue remains – and will remain – but can be managed down in us and in those we influence if we know what to recognize as racist and learn how to live with different sensibilities.

Brene Brown, in her excellent book, Braving the Wilderness, identifies a method that humanity has used to enable racism to grow to its ugliest and most horrific expressions.  Dehumanizing is a primary way we step toward legitimizing mistreatment of “other” people.  She writes:

Dehumanizing and holding people accountable are mutually exclusive.  Humiliation and dehumanizing are not accountability or social justice tools, they’re emotional off-loading at best, emotional self-indulgence at worst.  And if our faith asks us to find the face of God in everyone we meet, that should include the politicians, media, and strangers on Twitter with whom we most violently disagree.  When we desecrate their divinity, we desecrate our own, and we betray our faith (58).

In her book she illustrates how dehumanizing is what enabled Nazi Germany to kill millions of Jews: they were systematically dehumanized.  Killing a Jew wasn’t killing another human being in their rhetoric – may as well have been a rat.  When we use derogatory, sweeping terms for entire people groups, we are engaging in dehumanization.  When we denigrate others by speaking of all Hispanic people as Mexicans or illegals, we dehumanize.  When we call the LGBTQ community “the Gays”, we dehumanize.  When we slur our way around using pejorative terms about women, liberals, conservatives, Muslims, Jews, the poor – fill in the blank here – we dehumanize, which allows us to treat them inhumanely.

To bring this up close and personal (and current), Brown bring up the Black Lives Matter Movement and the controversy around supporting police and all people everywhere.  She writes:

Shouldn’t the rallying cry just be All Lives Matter?  No.  Because the humanity wasn’t stripped from all lives the way it was stripped from the lives of black citizens. In order for slavery to work, in order for us to buy, sell, beat, and trade people like animals, Americans had to completely dehumanize slaves.  And whether we directly participated in that or were simply a member of a culture that at one time normalized that behavior, it shaped us.  We can’t undo that level of dehumanizing in one or two generations.  I believe Black Lives Matter is a movement to rehumanize black citizens.  All lives matter, but not all lives need to be pulled back into moral inclusion.  Not all people were subjected to the psychological process of demonizing and being made less than human so we could justify the inhumane practice of slavery (59).

So many times I have heard people who look like me say, “I just don’t understand why they…” protest, commit crimes, riot, etc.  Exactly.  We whiter folk just don’t understand.  We don’t get it because we’re not black, LGBTQ, female, Hispanic, Muslim, an immigrant, or any other form of other.  The best way for us to move forward, if possible, is to discover ways to meet people who are different than us so that we increasingly grow toward the conclusion that there is no “them”, only us.  Much of our fear is based in ignorance.  The sooner we can discover just how false our expectations have been, the sooner we can be free from the fear of people not like us.  We can do this by befriending someone different than ourselves, and we can do this by learning from their perspective (books, articles, movies, TedTalks, etc.)

One of the last letters written in the New Testament came from John.  Speaking to people who were struggling to discover how to live like Jesus amidst people who were “different”, he offered these words:

God is love. When we take up permanent residence in a life of love, we live in God and God lives in us. This way, love has the run of the house, becomes at home and mature in us, so that we’re free of worry on Judgment Day—our standing in the world is identical with Christ’s. There is no room in love for fear. Well-formed love banishes fear. Since fear is crippling, a fearful life—fear of death, fear of judgment—is one not yet fully formed in love.

We, though, are going to love—love and be loved. First we were loved, now we love. He loved us first.

If anyone boasts, “I love God,” and goes right on hating his brother or sister, thinking nothing of it, he is a liar. If he won’t love the person he can see, how can he love the God he can’t see? The command we have from Christ is blunt: Loving God includes loving people. You’ve got to love both. – 1 John 4:17-21 (The Message)

The Greek word used for love here is “agape”, which is not simply a loving feeling, but an active love that serves even if personal sacrifice is required.  Hamilton, building from John’s words above, gives us this rule to live with when faced with fear of others.  He encourages us to ask ourselves, “In the situation I find myself in, what is the most loving thing I can do?”  That’s good advice that helps minimize fear and serves to create a better world in which to live.  For everyone.

Unafraid: Crime

This teaching is part of an ongoing series based in part on Adam Hamilton’s book, Unafraid.  For a more formal introduction and to get Adam Hamilton’s voice and style in your head, watch this video.

What African animal best describes you and why? Or, which do you most admire and why? I’ve been to Kenya a number of times, and have visited Nairobi National Park several times on safari.  We have been lucky pretty much every time, seeing the biggest and coolest animals that park has to offer: lions, rhino, water buffalo, hippopotamus, giraffe, etc.  We always see a dazzle of zebras.  And we also always see herds of impalas, but not for very long due to their skittish nature.  They spook easily – more, it seems, than others.  Adam Hamilton learned why: they are the savannah’s fast food.  Impalas are akin to McDonalds – and they know it.  They react all the time for good reason – they will be dining with the Lion family if they don’t.

Do you sometimes feel like the impala?  The general feeling among 79% of Americans is that crime is something to worry about at least a fair amount of time. We are fearful of crime.  Hamilton offered an acronym for FEAR: False Events Appearing Real.  False events (I prefer “expectations”) would include false reports of something ranging from complete fabrication to highly nuanced stories – once they are seen in the light of day, they don’t carry the same kind of weight that they may have before.  Many people struggle with lasting results based on real events in their lives, but their expectations for their future may be skewed.  For instance, I have either personally experienced or been pretty close to people who have experienced a wide range of crime, from car break-ins to serial murder.  It would be possible to live paralyzed by fear, knowing these things have happened – and could happen again.  But is that level of fear reality-based?

Cognitive Therapy: Alleviating Auto Thoughts of Catastrophizing and Binary Thinking.  There is a process from Cognitive Therapy that can be helpful in alleviating fear.  The process begins with holding whatever horrible thought with skepticism, choosing not to be convinced of its legitimacy upon first hearing about it.  This leads to the pursuit of reality: what are the facts of the matter?  Often times, the facts subvert the illusion of the falsehood’s claim to be real, which can give us a lot of peace.  Reminding ourselves frequently about the truth of the matter may help us become less victimized by the fear. 

Example.  Let’s say I live with significant anxiety about my daughter’s safety because a good friend of mine, Holly Tarr, was murdered in SoCal by serial killer Cleophus Prince, Jr., when she was my daughter’s age.  Her victimization was totally random.  She was visiting her brother on Spring Break her senior year in High School, and had no reason to suspect she was in danger.  There are approximately 15,000 murders in the United States each year.  That sounds like a big number (it is, and is tragic), but compared to the population as a whole (c. 327M), the odds are in our favor.  If you were placing a bet or taking a risk, you would feel extremely confident in your odds here, because the likelihood of you being murdered in the United States is .00045%.  You have a 99.9955% chance of not being murdered (1 in 25,000).  If you happen to be white or Asian, the odds are even better.  So, I could stay awake at night worrying about my daughter’s safety (my right as a parent), but the odds are about as good as they can get that she will be safe. As Hamilton notes, there are far more people dying from medical error (251K, or 1 in 14,000), we are twice as likely to die in a car crash than murder, and most of us should be more fearful about heart disease, which kills 1 in 40 Americans (2.5% annually).  Worry less about the killer with a knife or gun, and more about the killer that is deep fried.  If I get worked up about my daughter’s safety, reminding myself of the facts helps alleviate me from paralyzed.  If this persisted, reminding myself daily with mantras and well-placed post-it notes would help, I think.  If it still persisted, surely a therapist would help me over the hump.

It turns out that this struggle with False Events/Expectations Appearing Real is a common human phenomenon.  It shows up in the Jewish account of creation, in fact, with the very first human beings to enter the human drama: Adam and Eve.  After everything had been created, and Adam and Eve were told to enjoy everything in the garden except the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, they of course ate from it.  Because that’s what we do as human beings.  This story was originally shared with children and adults to remind them of our propensity toward doing the exact opposite of what we know to do, and for a wide range of reasons.  It was also told to provide a Jewish rendering of God which stood in stark contrast to many commonly held beliefs – maybe our innate, primitive, lizard-brain beliefs.  Post fruit-feast, we catch up with Adam and Eve, who now discovered they were naked, and were of course hiding in the bushes to hide from each other as well as from God:

When the cool evening breezes were blowing, the man and his wife heard the Lord God walking about in the garden. So they hid from the Lord God among the trees. Then the Lord God called to the man, “Where are you?”
He replied, “I heard you walking in the garden, so I hid. I was afraid because I was naked.”
“Who told you that you were naked?” the Lord God asked. “Have you eaten from the tree whose fruit I commanded you not to eat?” – Genesis 3:8-11 NLT)

This story would be recounted countless times because it would serve as a constant reminder that when people fail, even though their inclination is to fear the retribution of God, the nature of God is to be restorative.  God’s desire is to help us move forward on our way toward life.  Not to crush us. Restoration is not devoid of accountability, but the end goal is our healing,  not condemnation.

It is interesting how true this story is of humanity.  We have a tendency to react to situations and experiences before we have a chance to get the facts straight.  I wonder how many times we’ve been exposed over the course of our lives, called out from our hiding in the bushes that were protecting us from a false reality, protecting us from no real threat.

Of course, this story gives us great hope about the basis of our relationship with God.  And its repetition offers a tactic for helping us when we face our fears: we need to be reminded to think differently, to not simply react.

As we close this week, recall Hamilton’s process for handling fears below.  As you do, and if you are particularly fearful about crime, why not practice the process and see what might happen.

  • Face your fears with faith – because a well-considered faith in God can have a profound, positive impact on our lives.
  • Examine your assumptions in light of the facts – because we tend to react before we gain fuller understanding, often to our own detriment.
  • Attack your anxieties with action – because when we “do the thing we fear, the death of fear is certain” (Emerson).
  • Release your cares to God – because we can’t control everything, but God will be with us through it all to offer strength, guidance, and hope.

Questions to Ponder

1.       Has your impression been that crime is increasing, decreasing, or remaining about the same in our community?

2.       What helps inform your impressions about the level of crime?

3.       If the level of crime were significantly higher or lower than you expect, what might be some reasons?

4.       How has your personal experience of crimes impacted your level of anxiety regarding crime?

5.       Would knowing actual crime rates be helpful in establishing your beliefs about crime?

6.       What news sources do you frequent?  How do you mitigate against the sensationalism that news agencies must employ to gain and keep viewership?

7.       How can facts help us overcome our fears?  How can we mindfully integrate facts into our process to avoid reacting prematurely to what may be erroneous events or expectations?

8.       How does the story of Adam & Eve relate to all of this?  How does a well-considered faith help you?

9.       How will you integrate Hamilton’s FEAR Process this week?

 

Media Bias Infographic.jpg
Napa Crime Stats and Projections.jpg

Unafraid: April Fools

This is the introduction to a series which will borrow content and structure from Adam Hamilton's latest book, Unafraid.  Buy the book - worth the space in your library.

A high school teacher had a policy in his classroom: if any student had in incoming phone call on their mobile phone (this disrupting the class), they had to take the call on speakerphone.  One day, a student got a call, and the teacher reminder her of the rule.  She answered.  It was the local pregnancy resource center calling to inform and congratulate her that she was pregnant!  They went on to say that they understood that the father was out of the picture and would be happy to talk about all her options going forward.  During this awkward call, the teacher was visibly uncomfortable.  Immediately following the call, he publicly apologized for having her take such a private call.  She told him it was fine, that she already picked out the name: April for the first name.  Fools for the middle…  (Watch the video).

Anybody have a fear of getting pranked on this April Fools Day?

What are people afraid of these days in our culture?  Crime, race-related issues, terrorism, politics, failure, disappointing others, feeling insignificant, loneliness, apocalypse, change, missing out, finances, aging, illness, dying, God – these represent some pretty major areas that strike fear in the hearts of many.  How about you?  Which of these causes you a little anxiety?  Or panic attack?  Perhaps the list makes you aware of things you didn’t even think to be afraid of, but now you are!   Sorry…

Easter is such a happy holiday that we forget the fear that surrounded it.  The culture has made the day we celebrate the resurrected Christ into a general holiday for Spring.  Spring is the marker of new life, of course, so I guess it cold be worse.  But its easy to forget the incredible drama that took place the days before and after the first resurrection Sunday.  Many of the fear-inducing issues listed above would have been claimed by the disciples during those days.  They would be able to relate to us today from their experience.  The fears we face today are not new to humanity.  Others have been through what we’re experiencing.  Jesus’ disciples were so filled with fear after his crucifixion that they hid behind locked doors, fearful that they would be next to be executed.

Fear is a good thing, of course.  When we experience what we perceive as a threat, our reptilian brain kicks into action.  The emotional control portion of our brain called the amygdala triggers the release of epinephrine and cortisol to help us fight or take flight in order to survive.  A bunch of other things happen as well, all to protect us from the threat.  We need fear to protect us from danger.  Our brains remember certain stimuli and associate it with past events, both good and bad.  We have the ability to connect one sensory experience with something desirable or dangerous or frightening and respond in a related way.  This is called classical conditioning (remember Pavlov’s dog?). It’s this very helpful capacity that can also take us to some less helpful places, where fear can become debilitating even when the perceived threat is not as threatening as we imagine.

I once heard fear defined with the following acronym: False Expectations Appearing Real.  Well known and highly respected pastor and author Adam Hamilton, in his book Unafraid, which will provide material and organization for this series, heard it slightly differently: False Events Appearing Real.  False expectations may be directly related to false events or experiences, all combining to blind us to the reality before us – a reality that may not be nearly as fearful as we thought.  One hope for this series is that we would learn to see things more clearly so that we can assess whether or not our current level of fear is appropriate.  That alone can be freeing.

In addition to assessing the facts behind all of the areas we previously listed, we will also be talking about faith’s response, and what it means to live in faith instead of in fear.  I like how Adam Hamilton talks about what faith is not:

“I’m not, for example, talking about a saccharine faith that assures us that if we pray hard enough nothing bad will ever happen to us. As a pastor, I’ve walked with enough people through hell to know that this is not how life works. I am not proposing the theologically inaccurate view that everything that happens is the will of God. And I won’t insult you by suggesting that if only you have enough faith, you’ll never have fears. But I will suggest that a well-considered faith in God and the timeless insights of scripture can have a profound impact on your ability to experience peace, hope, and joy despite your fears.” (Unafraid, 34)

There is great value in the wisdom that our faith tradition offers.  There is nothing new under the sun, after all.  There is much to gain from the thoughtful experience of those who have gone before us.  There are many bruises we can avoid if we learn from them. Faith itself is one of those things they pass on to us – trusting that the overarching flow of God is always heading toward redemption, restoration, healing, harmony, etc.  Even if the circumstances we find ourselves in don’t appear so does not mean that God is not in the game.  Even in the worst of situations.  Perhaps especially as we walk through hell.

The good news about our brain’s capacity to be conditioned is that it can also be unconditioned.  Hamilton’s hope in writing this book, and my hope in riffing on it and talking with you about it each week is that we’ll emerge with less fear, and more faith.  Hamilton uses the word fear to spell out the process we’ll work through with each issue: “Face your fears with faith. Examine your assumptions in light of the facts. Attack your anxieties with action. Release your cares to God.”  Hamilton admits it’s a little cheesy and does not see this as a simple task.  It is a process that requires focus over time.  If the end result is we live more free from fear and all the ways it binds us up, then that is very much worth the effort.  Furthermore, if we can then become agents of hope over fear in a world that is currently riddled and motivated by fear – well, that’s a game changer.

Sometimes, even very good things can be terrifying:

“That Sunday evening the disciples were meeting behind locked doors because they were afraid of the Jewish leaders. Suddenly, Jesus was standing there among them! “Peace be with you,” he said. As he spoke, he showed them the wounds in his hands and his side. They were filled with joy when they saw the Lord!” – John 20:19-20 (NLT)

This experience of God breaking into our lives and bringing hope is what happens.  It happened long, long ago and was referenced by a Jewish Prophet named Isaiah: “He gives beauty for ashes, strength for fear, gladness for mourning, peace for despair” (Is. 61).  It is what the Apostle Paul referenced when he encouraged his protégé Timothy: God has not given you a spirit of fear, but power, love and self-control (2 Tim. 1:7).  And this reality is what gave Paul hope even as he wondered whether he would live or die: to live is Christ, and to die is gain (Phil. 1:21).  Paul, like so many others, saw Christ, which changed everything.  It still changes everything.  The call of faith is, in part, to decide where to look.

Are you familiar with the Peacock Mantis Shrimp?  There are some interesting things to note about this beautiful sea crustacean.  Its jab is as fast as a .22 caliber round.  Its punch is strong enough to break the glass of an aquarium tank.  And, it’s eyes have the most receptors of any creature known on earth.  At least four times as many receptors as human beings.  In other words, when we are looking at a rainbow – or anything else – that shrimp has the potential to see way more than we are capable of seeing.  Yet there is an unfortunate additional fact about our little friend: it has a terribly small brain.  Even though it has the capacity to see more than any creature, it is unknown whether the little dude’s brain does much with it.  Mainly, it spends it brainpower looking to beat to death unsuspecting prey.

We don’t have as many receptors as that shrimp, but millions who have gone before us and millions more who live today remind us that there is a way of seeing that allows us to have vision to see the divine breaking into our lives.  We can see God working all around us and within us.  We can live new and different lives because of that.  Seeing God in this life gives us increased confidence about the next life.  The question is, will we allow ourselves to see?  I wonder if our brains are trained to see in limited color in the face of extraordinary beauty and life? I wonder if we have been conditioned to see only in part.

Easter was the ultimate April Fools joke on death in all its forms.  Roman torture and oppression were punked.  The narrow Jewish theology espoused by the leading Sadducees got pranked as many people witnessed a real afterlife.  Paul, in light of the Good News of Christ, quoted the Jewish prophet Hosea who asked, “Death, where is your victory?  Death, where is your sting?”  So many issues confront us, arousing fear within us, including the fear of death itself.  But the hope of today is this declaration: in the love and embrace of God those fears will not have the final say as they suggest.  We can trust that the end of the story will be good because we know who is going to write the unfolding ending – a very good, loving God.  The joke is on fear itself.

To help you train your vision to see more and more of God breaking into the world, I leave you with this chorus from an old hymn.  May it stay with you as we face our fears together:

“Turn your eyes upon Jesus. Look full in his wonderful face, and the things of this world will grow strangely dim in the Light of his Glory and Grace.”

Heart and Home: Being Christian in an Age of Religious Pluralism

Week 11 of 12 | The Heart of Christianity by Marcus Borg

What do Stephen Curry, Buster Posey, Jimmy Garoppolo, and Joe Pavelski have in common?  They are all leaders of their respective teams, and they are all incredible athletes.  Next question: who among them is the best?  It’s a ludicrous question, of course, that cannot be adequately answered without clarifying what activity we’re talking about.  Basketball? Baseball? Football? Hockey? Sports in general? We can quickly recognize that it may not be fair to compare these players to each other since their respective games are played and scored differently.  They all play to win, but they play according to the rules of the game they play.

What do Abraham, Buddha, Jesus, and Mohammed have in common?  They are all founders of four of the largest, enduring religions in the world. Note: Hinduism dwarfs Judaism, but has no single founder. Rather, it is a synthesis of various Indian cultures and traditions.  Who among the four are the best?

The way we are accustomed to think about religion is to declare one the winner, or one as “true”, and the others as false, as “losers”.  Borg refers to this as the absolutist understanding of religion.  Christian Fundamentalism and its child Evangelicalism are built on the absolutist understanding of religion, and therefore take very seriously the work of converting people to Christianity as a means of saving people from what they deem as a false religion and the hell from which it stems and to which it leads.

Casual bystanders witnessing this passionate proselytizing pursuit are rejecting this absolutionist perspective in increasing numbers and accelerating speed.  Like Ricky Gervais, they see the surface argument in similar terms as my sports star analogy and throw up their hands – they walk away from both God and religion because the latter doesn’t seem to connect them to the former. They toss the whole thing as rubbish.  Borg refers to this as the Reductionist understanding of religion. Perhaps, then, using the same logic, they should also throw aside all sports since they all play by different rules.

But that’s not fair to Steph, Buster, Jimmy, and Joe; and certainly not to Abraham, Buddha, Jesus, and Mohammed, either. It’s way too simplistic in its understanding of religions, and far too hasty in its reaction to dismiss them all.

There is another way to understand religions of the world. Borg refers to it as the Sacramental approach.  This perspective recognizes that each of the world’s enduring religions were developed by human beings in response to their experience of the “More” – aka God, the Divine, the Ground of Being.  The purpose of the religions was to connect humanity with the sacred in their time, place, and with their language, stories, worldview and traditions.  Because they were created in their respective contexts, they sound different from each other, and only in the most general respects are they similar. That’s why the Reductionist approach goes too far – or actually not far enough – saying that religions all say the same thing.  They don’t – they are as unique as their origins. Different religions are trying to “win” at mediating the divine within their respective contexts as different sports offer contextualized games with the goal of winning in their particular way. Rather than seeing religions as in competition with each other, Borg sees them helping each other: “Understanding other religions can enrich our understanding of Christianity and what it means to be Christian. Religious pluralism can help us to see our own tradition better.”

In this “Religion as Sacrament” vein, the enduring religions of the world are viewed as such:

1.       Religions are human creations…

2.       … in response to experiences of the sacred

3.       Religions are “cultural-linguistic traditions”

4.       Enduring religions are “wisdom traditions”

5.       Religions are aesthetic traditions

6.       Religions are communities of practice

7.       Religions are communities of transformation

While the enduring religions of the world are different one to the other, they also share these following attributes in common:

1.       They all affirm the more, the real, the sacred

2.       They all affirm a path of transformation

3.       They all provide practices for the journey

4.       They all extol compassion: life’s primary virtue

5.       They all contain collections of belief/teaching

Some use the example of various paths leading up the same mountain.  Christians who have adopted the absolutist view balk at the analogy, saying that the other religions don’t adequately deal with sin, or don’t even refer much to heaven, therefore they are inferior to Christianity. Borg offers a different version of the analogy, however.  Each path originates from its particular place on the base of the mountain, with all of its contextual influences.  Each path makes its way toward the top of the mountain where the clouds cover the peak.  The path doesn’t take you to heaven, it takes you to the Divine, God, the Greater Other, the Higher Power.  Winning isn’t defined by which formula gets you into heaven.  As sacramental vehicles, success is ushering adherents into the Presence of God.

A normal, natural question in response might be, why bother with religion at all?  Why not just be spiritual and call it good?  Borg suggests that religions still play a crucial role in our spiritual pursuit.  “Religion,” he says, “is to spirituality as institutions of learning are to education.”  Can you learn apart from the institutions?  Sure.  But you’ll likely learn more, faster, with the external forms of religion helping you.  The wisdom, rituals, practices and collections of beliefs serve as vessels of spirituality, mediators of the sacred and the way.  Without them, I believe you will get stuck and miss  out on much of what is offered: both in terms of understanding the Divine and the fuller experiences of life.

Another question might be, what about the statements attributed to Jesus that appear to support an exclusive understanding of Christianity as the only legitimate religion?  Borg suggests that we see and hear such words as those communicating truth and devotion.  For Jesus and his early followers, following Jesus was the only way that resonated with them, was the object of their devotion, and was the center of their message of hope.  Borg noted that we may use similar language when referring to our “home” – our dwelling or perhaps the geographical place we live or our country.  We speak with absolute devotion about our “home”, articulating the truths of its splendor to whoever will listen.  But, as Borg notes, loving our home deeply doesn’t make it superior to someone else’s home.  They can love and have their home wherever they are.

There is a beautiful song sung to the tune Finlandia that communicates this reality.  Imagine replacing references to nations, lands, and countries with religion, faith, etc.  Below are the lyrics, and here is the song beautifully sung.

This Is My Song (Finlandia)

This is my song, O God of all the nations
A song of peace, for lands afar & mine
This is my home, the country where my heart is
Here are my hopes, my dreams, my holy shrine
But other hearts in other lands are beating
With hopes and dreams as true and high as mine

My country's skies are bluer than the ocean
And sunlight beams on clover leaf and pine
But other lands have sunlight too, and clover
And skies are everywhere as blue as mine
This is my song, O God of all the nations
A song of peace for their land and for mine

The Dalai Lama was asked by a Christian if she should convert to Buddhism.  He told her, “No. Instead, become a very good Christian.”  Borg recalled a wisdom saying: “If you desire water, you are better off digging one well 60 feet deep than six wells ten feet deep.”  It is good and wise to respect different traditions and religions.  It is also good and wise to go deep with the one that is most “home” – for the overwhelming majority of people in the United States who are already familiar with the Christian tradition, this is a well worth digging into.  You are likely to find a spring that offers living water that will never run dry.

Borg ends his book with this, as part of his answer to why he is a Christian: At the heart of Christianity is the way of the heart – a path that transforms us at the deepest level of our being.  At the heart of Christianity is the heart of God – a passion for our transformation and the transformation of the world. At the heart of Christianity is participating in the passion of God.

I am, and certainly plan to remain, a devoted Christian.  Christianity mediates the sacred well for me and so many others.  With it’s guide I am ushered into the Loving Presence of the Divine, guided to love and be loved, and compelled to be used by God to be an agent of restoration, renewal, and even resurrection in this very good world we call home.

What about you?  Where is your “home”?  How deep is your well?

The Heart of the Matter: Practice

Week 10 of 12 | The Heart of Christianity by Marcus Borg

Just like riding a bike… When did you learn to ride a bike?  When was the last time you rode a bike?  Why did you ride a bike?  Why do you now, or why don’t you anymore?  My guess is that most of you reading this are very occasional riders, and do so for pleasure, not transportation.  It’s a relaxing thing to do when it’s not too hot or cold, not too windy, and you are in just the right mood.  You and I are not Danny Macaskill, for instance, who recorded one of his more impressive rides on the Isle of Sky, Scotland (get your mind blown here).  Danny Macaskil didn’t tackle that ride the same week he learned to ride a bike.  He was able to achieve that level of mastery over years of hard work and practice, working through mistakes and the injuries that came with them.  Learning new techniques while unlearning ways that no longer work for the rides he takes.

Faith is like that.  We don’t commit ourselves to God in one moment and discover we’re saints the next day or week.  Those with deep, growing, maturing faith have worked hard to develop it over time.  They have worked through mistakes they’ve made and the injuries that came with them.  They learned new ways of being while letting go of ways that no longer work for the faith they’ve grown into.  In the tenth chapter of The Heart of Christianity, Borg gets down to the nitty gritty: he writes about practices that help faith develop.  He notes a lot of things, including making church attendance a regular part of your life rhythm (for a range of good reasons), and especially encourages getting involved in justice issues that surround us.

I want to get practical as well, but instead of using Borg’s metric, I’d prefer to look at CrossWalk’s.  We designed our belief statement to be a behavior statement as well, a picture of what we’re trying to embody individually and as a community of faith.  Not surprisingly, there is plenty of overlap between the substance of what I am writing and what Borg wrote: we are both trying to get at the same thing.  We are trying to paint a picture of what a well-rounded faith looks like so that we have a clue whether or not we’re on the right track or, if we’re just beginning, a clue where to start and where it’s leading.

Be aware of potential tensions that may emerge as you read and as you strive to live your faith.  First, settle the issue in your mind that your favor with God in no way whatsoever is contingent on how well you develop your faith.  You are loved fully, unconditionally, and eternally by God.  It is impossible for God to be God and not love you.  Therefore, you are not trying to earn your way into anything or any status: you already have it.

Second, be aware of the “tyranny of the shoulds,” a phrase that originated with one of the shaping voices of modern psychology, Karen Horney.  We can easily get into a rut where we do a bunch of practices and actually find ourselves more distanced from God, leading to resentment of God for “making you do all this stuff.”  When we find ourselves with a bad attitude about doing things we normally would love to do, we need to carve time to drill down on what’s happening, because something has taken the life out of something that was supposed to give life.  Find out why.  Get insight from someone you trust.  Seek healing for hurts.

I really like what Borg says about the purpose of practices: they are about paying attention to God; our formation as Christians with a new identity; and our nourishment – they feed us.  Keep these three purposes front of mind so that you are less likely to get off track.  Also, please realize that Jesus did not airdrop from heaven at 30 years old.  He was born into a tradition that formed his thinking.  Much of what he said was not new, but rather a restoration of the core of what Judaism was meant to say all along.  In other words, some of the practices – if not all – were taught him.  Sometimes I get binary with this stuff. I like to think that if our hearts are really pure and our relationship with God is super strong, our behavior will naturally reflect it.  Certainly, our core faith fosters such behavior.  But sometimes – maybe all the time? – we need practical instruction.  Sometimes if we live into a mask we choose to wear, we eventually fit the mask.  That’s not so bad if the mask reflects Jesus.  So, as we look at the practices of Jesus, may you see a mask worth wearing, and may you eventually find your face and life forming into it.

We are resurrection people.  That born again into new life thing is where we start, and also informs our mission in the world: to bring about life where death has claimed victory.  Renewed selves, renewed culture, renewed creation.  Pursuing this resurrected living requires a choice to actually embrace it.  Not one choice for all time, but a choice that is made daily or even more frequently to live our lives in the Way of Jesus in contrast to the way of this world.  The Way leads to life, and is a choice we make to follow or not.  The following are practices that we choose to embrace, as Jesus did, so that we might experience the life Jesus lived.

·       We stretch.  To pursue a relationship with God is a choice to be continually stretched to new ways of thinking and being.  When Jesus was with Nicodemus, John the Baptist, and the Samaritan woman at the well, he stretched their thinking with love and respect, even though it required them to let go of the familiar.  Therefore, we choose to stretch as God grows in us, and we lovingly help others stretch toward God as God works through us.  John 3-4

o   How are you choosing to be stretched?  What inputs are you allowing in to stretch you?

o   How are you being a catalyst to stretch others in their thinking?

·       We kneel.  Jesus served humbly without discrimination.  He served enemies of the state, touched untouchables, healed those who were broken, and fed those who were hungry.  Therefore, we choose to share God’s love by kneeling to serve as Jesus modeled, bringing healing to our world.  John 5-7

o   How are you allowing others to serve you?

o   How are you serving others with your time and presence?  How about financially?

·       We grace.  Jesus was famous for lavishly extending grace to everyone, but especially to those who were feeling condemned.  Be it an adulterous woman caught in the act or a blind man convinced that he was beyond grace, Jesus acted with and spoke grace into their lives in order to free them from condemnation in all its forms.  Therefore, we choose to lift up those who experience shame, to love instead of judge.  John 8-9

o   How are you allowing God’s grace to form you?

o   How are you an agent of God’s grace in an unforgiving world?

·       We incarnate.  God’s love was perhaps most profoundly expressed in the incarnation, when God entered the full human experience with us in the person of Jesus.  He loved deeply by being intimately present with people in their grief, joy, shame, pain, filth, denial, and even their betrayal.  Therefore, we choose to welcome God into our darkest corners, and as those who are being indwelled by God’s Spirit, we choose to live deeply with people in the same intimate places Jesus chose to dwell.  John 10-13

o   How are you making time to really be with people in your sphere?

o   How are you allowing people to be with you?

·       We connect.  Jesus’ Way kept him connected to the heartbeat of God.  Jesus fostered an intimate, personal relationship with God by practicing a variety of disciplines (solitude, prayer; gathering for worship, service, and community life) that allowed God’s presence to guide and direct his steps.  Therefore, we choose to be so connected that the image of God is clearly reflected in our thoughts, passion, and mission.  John 14-17

o   How are you providing space in your life to be more deeply connected to God?

o   How are you encouraging others to connect with God more deeply without sounding like a self-righteous jerk?

How is all of this going for you?

Let’s talk about bikes some more.  For most – if not all – of us, while Danny Macaskill’s riding skills are incredibly impressive and inspiring, they are not especially alluring.  I doubt any of you are going to go to Skyline in response and attempt its technical trails at full speed!  Most of you are fine knowing how to ride a bike, yet are also fine if you never ride one again. I think that’s fine with bike riding.  Take it or leave it.

But faith is not bike riding.  We claim to believe that faith so defines our lives that to not live in our faith is to actually not really live.  When we talk about our faith, we’re talking about our lives.  When we talk about settling in our faith, we’re talking about choosing to not live into resurrection, into renewed life. 

Mostly, we don’t willfully settle.  There’s not a day on our calendar where we look back and say, “That’s the day I decided to blow off God and settle for less of a life.”  It’s much more subtle than that, and usually goes hand in hand with our level of comfort.  Many of us came to faith in response to crisis.  What we didn’t realize was that when the crisis was alleviated – often with the help of faith – our sense of urgency to continue developing our faith diminished.  We slide back into comfortable routines and ruts.  Decades pass and we wake up one day realizing we are the same person we were long ago, with few significant changes.  That’s not the Way of Jesus.  That’s the way of the world, the way of self-preservation, the way of apathy.  That’s the way we insure the world continues on the same trajectory it has been on for as long as anyone can remember.

This isn’t a leisurely bike ride we’re talking about.  This is your life.  This is your role as a change agent of hope in the world.  This is the nourishment of your soul.  This is the source of your hope.  What are you doing with it?

Sin and Salvation: Transforming the Heart

Part 9 of 12 | Based in part on Marcus Borg's The Heart of Christianity

Think back to your earliest impressions of the Church and the Christian faith – the two are often intertwined.  What was the point or goal as you understood it?  My hunch is that if you grew up in the United States, the dominant message articulated was that sin was and is an issue that needs to be addressed to restore our relationship with God.  Salvation is what we called accepting that forgiveness, which was mediated on the cross which killed Jesus, who was considered a final, eternal, complete sacrifice canceling the power of sin.  You no longer need fear hell, and could confidently look forward to heaven.

This has been the dominant message from Western Christianity for the past few centuries.  In the United States in particular, the emphasis became more individualized: the idea of a personal relationship with a personal savior became paramount.  “Are you saved?” became a leading question in evangelistic strategies, which was really asking, “have you accepted the forgiveness of God to cancel your sin so that you can go to heaven?”  Fear of death is universal, and fear of eternal punishment is certainly correlated!  For people with minor to major awareness of sin issues in their lives, this is truly good news, and has been received as such for millions and millions of people, including me!  If we were creating a resume for God, we could put “Sin Forgiver and Heaven Provider” right at the top.

Concern about death and afterlife weren’t always the central message communicated from our faith tradition.  In fact, there is little evidence that the Jewish people were even thinking about the afterlife much before 150 B.C.E.  For them, there was a bigger issue: getting back home.  The people of Israel were scattered by the Babylonians, and longed to go back home.  The message of the prevailing prophets for a couple of centuries was that God was going to lead them back home.  That was “salvation” for them, and it was truly good news.  So, add “Guide” to the resume.

Before Israel was decimated, the focal point of the Jewish faith was the Exodus event, where Israel was rescued from the bondage of slavery in Egypt, and God miraculously redeemed them from there, eventually leading them into the Promised Land.  Salvation for those early Jews meant being saved from slavery.  The remembrances of God in worship all centered around that great event, which was truly good news.  So, add “Liberator” to God’s resume.

These are three major themes that work through the entirety of scripture.  They provide great hope for people who are worried about how mistakes and sin in general might affect our afterlife; hope when we feel lost and want to get back home; and hope when we feel oppressed and need liberated.  And yet, as sweeping as these themes are, there is so much more that God provides.  Here are a number of examples from the life and ministry of Jesus to give you an idea:

·       He taught people a new way to live based on a new identity from God.

·       He spoke words of hope to people who felt hopeless.

·       He healed people of every disease.

·       He demonstrated how to achieve peace with enemies.

·       He restored sight to the blind.

·       He brought those who strayed back into the fold.

·       He fed hungry people.

·       He challenged those who were abusing their power.

·       He touched people who were untouchable.

·       He kept judged people from dying.

·       He brought dead people back to life.

·       He taught and modeled how to forgive and restore people.

·       He chose to come alongside people no matter what.

·       He modeled nonviolence.

·       And more…

That’s a pretty strong resume.  I wonder how many people shortchange faith because they just don’t quite see all that God is capable of doing.  I think we sometimes miss out on a lot because we just don’t ask God for help in ways that God can.  It’s like asking Bill Gates to just help you connect your computer to your printer.  Or Warren Buffett to just help balance your checkbook.  Or Steph Curry just to teach you how to do a proper lay-up. Or guitarist Tommy Emanuel how to play a “E” chord. Or Thomas Keller to just teach you how to fry an egg.  So much more depth than we ask, partly because we’ve siloed faith to the sin management and afterlife realm.  Important?  Of course.  Complete?  In countless ways, no.

So, take a look in the mirror.  As you examine yourself, keep that resume handy.  How have you sold your faith short because you simply haven’t looked to God for guidance on so many areas God has expertise?  Having trouble feeling good about yourself?  Or forgiving others – or yourself? Or unsure how to deal with enemies? Or feel hopeless?  Your faith speaks into all aspects of life -  have you wondered how God might help you find your way home, or help rescue you from captivity?

In our culture today, it is all too easy to stop there.  We discover anew what’s in it for us, and feel like we’re done.  God surely is personal and definitely does want to help us become more whole in every regard.  And yet if we could place ourselves in Jesus’ culture, we would quickly recognize that they were not driven by a “what’s in it for me” mentality, but were much more interested in their community as a whole. It wasn’t okay if they were well fed if their neighbor was starving.  We need to shift our gaze away from our reflection in the mirror and look through a window into our world so that we can see how we might help everyone experience all that God provides. 

This is a tough sell for us unless we are facing a crisis.  Tragedies of all kinds bring out the best in people – we know we have it in us.  But when the urgency is gone, we often resort back to just looking after ourselves.  If it’s not our problem, or if it’s not our experience, then we feel like we needn’t lift a finger.

Unfortunately for you (if you are a CrossWalker), we have this little phrase that we say a lot: Go Be Jesus.  Jesus didn’t just look after himself – he spent his life looking after others.  I don’t think he would have been as fully actualized had he not have spent his life serving others.  Jesus is our model.  If he’s going, we need to be following.  If he’s on the move, it must be a good idea, so we need to do it.

The question isn’t will you serve others, it’s how will you serve others? So now, look out the window onto the world, and as you do, hold that resume in your hand.  The things Jesus did still need doing, and he needs you to do them.  You need you to do them.  The people who need to be served need you to do them.  What are you going to do to live into the footsteps of Jesus?

Thin Places: Opening the Heart

Part 8 of 12 | Based on The Heart of Christianity, by Marcus Borg

In the eighth chapter of his book, The Heart of Christianity, Marcus Borg shifts to addressing God breaking into our consciousness as individuals and community, then draws attention to why God would do such a thing: to open our hearts.  When we use the term heart in a non-medical sense of the word, we are generally talking about a person’s deeper self, their identity, their passion, their emotional life – a range of things.  This is similar to how biblical writers employed the term as well, using it to refer to the inner self as a whole.  If a person’s heart was off, or not “in it”, or closed, it meant there was something deeply wrong.  This is because, as Borg notes, “The heart is an image for the self at a deep level, deeper than our perception, intellect, emotion, and volition.  As the spiritual center of the total self, it affects all of these: our sight, thought, feelings, and will” (120).

A closed heart, therefore, would refer to a person who wasn’t seeing fully, thinking correctly, has a poor attitude, and isn’t likely manifesting itself in the kinds of behavior God would encourage.  There are times when our closed heartedness catches up with us and slaps us in the face (or worse).  When we see it, we know we’re in a mess, which often brings us to a fork in the road where we humble ourselves and open up to God, ourselves, and others about it and begin moving in a healthier direction.  Or we double down and stay stuck, choosing instead to beef up our pride, puff up our chests, deny any wrongdoing and pretend things never happened.  This latter choice makes our hearts harder still.  The former choice, however, opens us up to the experience of God by created “thin places” that allow God to be especially present right here.  Thomas Merton expressed it well:

Life is this simple.  We are living in a world that is absolutely transparent, and God is shining through it all the time.  This is not just a fable or a nice story. It is true. If we abandon ourselves to God and forget ourselves, we see it sometimes, and we see it maybe frequently. God shows Himself everywhere, in everything – in people and in things and in nature and in events. It becomes very obvious that God is everywhere and in everything and we cannot be without Him. It’s impossible. The only thing is that we don’t see it.

The reason God chooses to come close is to help open and keep open our hearts, our deepest selves, to God’s presence and purpose for life.  We are a part of the whole, we impact the whole, and when we are open, we bless the whole.  Open hearts allow people to see more fully, think more openly, walk through life with life-giving attitudes, and act as God leads.  This is where beautiful things can happen.  Borg notes: “The Christian life is about a new heart, an open heart, a heart of flesh, a heart of compassion.  The Christian life is about the Spirit of God opening our hearts in thin places” (131).

A concept Borg noted in his chapter on being born again that stuck with me fits this pursuit of thin places.  He wrote about “spirituality as midwifery”, that what we do with our lives, and in particular our spiritual lives, fosters the born again experience.  Only God can truly make it happen, but our actions play a role in improving the likelihood of the new life being born in us.  So, how do we move beyond closed hearts toward open hearts?  We allow for, we facilitate, we create opportunities for thin places where God is more likely to get through to us.

Borg highlighted a handful of “tools” that help us cultivate thin places in our lives.  Music, for many people, has the capacity to take us to higher heights and deeper depths.  Sometimes it’s the lyrics that connect.  U2’s Grace comes to mind for me.  Sometimes the song doesn’t need to have lyrics to be powerful.  Barber’s Adagio for Strings comes to mind.  Worship provides a thin space where music, community, and learning come together.  Study is a means for me – when I read something of depth, or listen to a good podcast, or watch an engaging video, it opens me up to God’s voice somehow.  For many, nature is the quickest path to thin places, where we are caught up in creation which always reflects the Creator. 

For our culture – now more than every before in history – I think we need to consider one other variables that I believe will provide space – think places – for God to break in: silence.  We surely live in the noisiest time in history.  If the sounds of traffic, construction, emergency vehicles and the like aren’t enough to pollute your auditory senses, there’s always that gadget in your pocket or purse.  Our phones.  Which are TV’s, juke boxes, and – oh yeah – telephones, berate us with an assault of noise.  Seemingly constantly.  Biblically, however, silence seems to go hand in hand with experiencing the inbreaking of God’s voice.  I would even suggest that the Way of Christ whispers.  Constantly.  That Way – God’s Way – is all over the Bible.  The creation hymn in Genesis 1 begins with silence, broken with God speaking everything into being.  Adam and Eve were hiding in silence when that critical, post-forbidden fruit talk needed to happen.  Abraham no doubt heard God in silence.  Joseph, his great grandson, experienced God’s visions in the silence of dreams.  Job only heard God responded after his friends stopped talking, and when he himself finally shut up.  Samuel heard God calling only when he was alone and quiet.  Isaiah had a vision which undoubtedly necessitated silence as well.  Elijah heard God in the still, small voice – literally in the sound of silence.  Zechariah was quiet before God in the Temple when he heard the news that he was going to father John the Baptist.  Mary had to be quiet enough for the angel to speak, and Joseph had to be asleep – quiet! – for the angel to get through to him.  Jesus himself, after his baptism, spent 40 days in the wilderness alone in the quiet to sort out what God wanted him to do.  Peter was quiet in meditation when he received the message about including Gentiles.  Paul was quieted by Christ’s surprising visit, then spent a season in quiet learning about what was true and what wasn’t.

We may not be comfortable in silence, but how are we to hear the whisper of God if we constantly keep the noise on?  We need to learn how to quiet ourselves.  It takes time and work.  Olympic athletes don’t suddenly become incredible – they started somewhere and kept learning and growing.  Some folks can barely go 10 seconds before their minds are wandering all over the place.  Depth cannot develop with such short attention spans.  So, get an app that will help you develop the skills of meditation, so that you can be quiet, then quiet before God.  Imagine all you have missed over your life because you simply weren’t listening!  Imagine what awaits!  Listening in quiet provides a thin place which become sacred space which leads to open hearts which leads to life at its best for everybody.

Dag Hammarskjold, Swedish diplomat and Secretary General of the United Nations (1953-1961) understood what cultivating an open heart represents, as witnessed in his journal which he used while on a peacekeeping mission in the Congo.  May his pray be ours:

Give us pure hearts, that we may see you;

Humble hearts, that we may hear you;

Hearts of love, that we may serve you;

Hearts of faith, that we may abide in you.

The Kingdom of God: The Heart of Justice

Note: Due to technical difficulties, there are no audio or video recordings of this teaching.

Part 7 of 12 of Marcus Borg's The Heart of Christianity

“Don’t talk about politics or religion.”  That’s how we avoid fisticuffs in social settings.  Luckily, reading this blog or listening to the podcast or watching this teaching on YouTube isn’t social, so we can talk about both.

At what point in your life were you able to clearly articulate the political position of your parents?  At what point were you able to (as objectively as possible) recognize the differences between your positions and theirs?  My kids took a Political Science/Government class in High School.  One of their earliest assignments was to take a brief survey, and then have Lynne and I take the same survey separately.  I knew what was up as soon as I heard what was being asked.  The teacher wanted to discover to what extent his students reflected their parents’ political leanings.  As you might guess, nearly every student was closely corelated to their parents.  Of course.  Parents are the primary influence for the first 18 years of their kids’ lives.  How they see and articulate the world is passed along to their children.  And, unless something causes the child to seriously evaluate those positions, they are likely to be held well into adulthood – perhaps their entire life – without serious reflection.

So, I ask again in another way: when did your political opinions become your political opinions and not just a parroting of your parents? 

Jesus, Son of Man.  Jesus was human, if you haven’t heard.  He was born at a particular time in history, in a very specific geographical location, into a demographic none of us would choose.  He was raised in rural northern Israel while it was under Roman occupation.  Very, very few (like .1%) of Jewish people were living what we might call a Middle Class existence where they had more than enough to live on.  99.9% were poor, very poor, or extremely poor.  The poorest were day laborers, which likely included people with carpentry skills.  Jesus, like his father who trained him, was a carpenter by trade.  He was very poor like most of the people around him.

Like his contemporaries, Jesus struggled throughout his life to get food on the table and avoid debt – two chief concerns of normal everyday folk in first century northern Israel.  Like all others around him, Jesus undoubtedly had strong opinions about Pax Romana – the Peace of Rome – which made  sure peace was kept by strong military presence and action.  Rome called it keeping the peace.  Israelites like Jesus and the vast majority of others called it oppression.

Two Kingdoms.  If you ask biblical scholars what the chief themes of Jesus’ teaching would include, at the top of the list will be the Kingdom of God.  When Jesus spoke about the Kingdom of God, he was really talking about what things would be like on earth if God were in charge.  These teachings would, by their very nature, stand in sharp contrast to the Kingdom that wielded power of their lives every day:  Rome.  Rome led by domination.  They were politically oppressive – allegiance was mandatory.  They were economically exploitative – someone had to pay for the Roman Road and Caesar’s excessive pageantry.  And unfortunately, as it seems to always go for humanity, since they were the dominant “Super Power” in the world at that time, it surely must have meant that the gods were smiling on them, legitimating everything they stood for and the actions their stance led them to take.

Except for the Jewish aristocracy leading in Jerusalem and a few Jewish people who were in the right place at the right time, everybody agreed that Rome was ripping them off, making it harder and harder to live.  Everybody knew that being poor sucked, and that the Roman system made sure they stayed poor by over taxing those they oppressed.  If you couldn’t pay the taxes, you owed a debt.  If you couldn’t pay the debt, you went to jail, which made it harder to pay the debt, which led to a cycle of generational oppression which carried with it a hopelessness that is hard to overcome.  All of this while you wonder if God sees you through the same lens as Rome?  And, at the end of the day, while Rome gave plenty of room allowing for people to continue Jewish cultic practices, when you were asked to pledge allegiance, it had better be to Rome and her Caesar.  Or you may be put to death under certain circumstances (like on Tuesdays or Wednesdays or other days ending in “day”).  Nobody in the first century needed a history lesson on the politics of the Roman Empire because they all lived it.

When Jesus spoke of the way things would be if God were in charge, everybody knew he was drawing a contrast and implicit criticism of the Roman Empire.  They knew it because they were living it.  Jesus’ rhetoric, lifestyle and ministry were boldface challenges to those who held power – political and religious – and everyone knew it.  When Jesus was inviting people to “Follow me!”, it was an invitation to pledge allegiance to a different Kingdom that operated in sharp contrast to Rome.  Just because you and I don’t readily recognize it doesn’t change a difficult-to-swallow reality: Jesus was extremely political.

Politically Speaking.  There are words attributed to Jesus that we float on by and even quote that were direct challenges to Rome and we probably didn’t realize it.  We have sanitized and sanctified some words and phrases so much that they only now refer to matters of heaven.  But when Jesus used these words, and especially when he said that the power of such words is sourced in God and not Rome, he was giving the finger to the Empire.  Evangelism.  Salvation.  Peace.  Savior.  Lord.  Cross.  Bread.  Debts.  Resurrection.  All of these were deeply meaningful words used in Roman rhetoric before Jesus used those same words to speak of God’s Kingdom.  The Good News (evangelism) that Rome came to declare was that the Empire was the source of salvation for all who pledged allegiance to the Savior and Lord, Caesar, who would in exchange provide peace.  For those who did not comply, the cross was provided as a symbol of Roman dominance.  Of course, the oppressed knew the taxes such allegiance required would not be adequate to provide daily bread, and would usher them into servitude as their debt to Rome climbed.  Rome legitimated itself with direct proof from the gods: when an emperor would die, they would look to the heavens and behold: a shooting star would eventually appear: a sign that their Lord had been resurrected to life in heaven among the gods who ruled from on high. 

Jesus challenged all of that.  Since the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem were charged with keeping the Jewish people in line with Roman politics, Jesus’ threat to Rome was also a threat to them, their position, and their authority.  Of course, plenty of things Jesus said and did threatened their authority in myriad ways; the politically-charged, insurrectionist vibe was just the icing on the cake.  Jesus was a threat.

Pledging Allegiance?  When Jesus invited people to follow him, he was asking people to pledge allegiance to the Kingdom of God, to strive toward the things God would strive toward if God were running the show.  This meant that life on earth would be lived differently because the world and the people in it needed help now, not just after life on earth was over.  Why?  Because, as New Testament scholar John Dominic Crossan explained, “Heaven is in great shape; earth is where the problems are.”  Marcus Borg (The Heart of Christianity) continues: “Seeing the political passion of the Bible and Jesus calls us to a politically engaged spirituality that affirms both spiritual and political transformation.  What we see in Jesus and the Bible answers our deepest personal longing, to be born again, and the world’s great need: the Kingdom of God.”  The systems of the world throughout history has failed.  The ones who it has failed the most are the most vulnerable in the world – the poor, the suffering, the immigrant, the outcast.  Those who pledge allegiance to the Kingdom of God are pledging to care for them, because the systems of the world can’t, don’t and won’t.  Regardless of what lips are saying.

As Jesus followers, this means we are called to follow in his political footsteps.  You may reel at this, shaking your head as you shout: “I refuse to be political!”  Well my friend, I have some potentially unwelcome news for you: you already are, and you have been your entire adult life.  Whether or not you realize it, you have been pledging allegiance all along with your words, your time, your wallet, your behavior, your passion, your gifts and skills, your dreams, everything.  Perhaps you already understand this to a degree as you have seen the lack of potency the various world systems have offered in their failed attempts at leadership.  For some of you it’s personal: you are a woman who realizes that it is not right that you are not treated equally to men.  Or maybe you’re among those in the LGBTQ community or love someone who is.  Or you’re an undocumented immigrant or love someone who is.  Or you are poor and know you’re stuck.  Or you’re facing health challenges and can’t afford treatment even with “affordable care” that still isn’t for so many.  Or you’ve taken an Alaskan cruise and seen for yourself the retreating glaciers caused by global warming.  Or you’re beginning to become numb to the horror of school shootings because they are so frequent and you realize that is problematic and something has to be done.  Or a hundred other scenarios.  Jesus is saying there is another way, another Leader who is calling for allegiance that will help bring about the healing the world cannot do on its own (and won’t).

This means you and I need to wake up to the fact that this is bigger than a Republican v. Democrat issue.  That our pledge has to be higher than the American Flag.  That our vision has to be broader.  That our love has to run deeper.  That our hopes need to soar higher.  Because God is behind God’s own Kingdom, and it is everlasting.  Pledging allegiance to this Way means at times you are going to challenge whatever the Republicans are saying.  And at other times the Democrats.  And at other times you will be called to take issue with U.S. stances on who knows what.  Because the United States is not God, even though we feel like we rule the world at times.  The Kingdom of God is globally focused and not simply nationalistic.  It is deeply personal and individual and yet is about all people everywhere, and the entire creation not just for now but for the future as well.

You already are political.  The question is, to which Kingdom are you pledging your allegiance?

Before you click out of this, I have a dare for you.  Now that you know that Jesus was deeply political in his life, ministry, and teaching, I dare you to read and pray the dangerous prayer Jesus taught, but with new eyes.  May it challenge you to consider your politics and get your butt in gear to help do your part in bringing the Kingdom Come.  By the way, it’s hard.  If it’s really easy for you, you’re probably not paying attention. It was meant to be a model to riff on, not just something we recite like programmed minions.  “Our Father (our Identity), Who art in Heaven (not Rome), Hallowed be Thy Name (may you be revered and seen as holy).  Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven (as Crossan pointed out, ‘heaven is in great shape; earth is where the problems are’).  Give us this day our daily bread (because we’re not sure we’ll eat today otherwise), and forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors (which is an economic mechanism that is used to control people into submission).  Lead us not into temptation. Deliver us from evil.  For Yours is the Kingdom, and the Power, and the Glory forever (again, not Rome).  Political, political, political.

The Lord’s (Dangerous) Prayer: Our Father Who Art in Heaven, hallowed be Thy name.  Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in Heaven. Give us this day our daily bread.  Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors. Lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil. For Thine is the Kingdom, and the Power, and the Glory forever.  Amen!

Born Again: A New Heart

Part 6 of 12 | The Heart of Christianity, Marcus Borg

The Gospel of John is my favorite of the four “biographies” of Jesus.  John’s agenda is not merely giving the story, but weaving it along theological lines. One of the first stories provides an allusion for one man named Nicodemus, and for all people everywhere trying to find God and their way in the world.  The third chapter starts with Nicodemus coming to see Jesus under cover of darkness.  He was a very well educated leader who held a seat on the Sanhedrin Jewish leadership table.  He had undoubtedly heard about Jesus’ renown as a gifted teacher and healer, and he wanted to see for himself what kind of man he was.

It’s no accident that he came at night – he didn’t want to be seen visiting this upstart.  More than that, he was in the dark personally, not yet exposed to the Light shining in the darkness, the bright Spirit that was illuminating Jesus’ life, teaching, and ministry.  Breaking the ice, Nicodemus started the conversation with a compliment about Jesus’ clear connection to God.  A bit of a setup, actually, to see how arrogant Jesus was.

Jesus jumped right into the deep end of the pool, dragging Nicodemus with him.  He spoke of the need to be born again to see the Kingdom of God – a phrase denoting space that is particularly infused with the presence, characteristics, priorities and practices of God.  Nicodemus took Jesus literally, and wondered how, exactly, a grown human would get back inside the mother’s womb.  At that, Jesus probably rolled his eyes and let out a sigh (murmuring “METAPHOR!”) before he continued:

     Jesus said, "You're not listening. Let me say it again. Unless a person submits to this original creation—the 'wind hovering over the water' creation, the invisible moving the visible, a baptism into a new life—it's not possible to enter God's kingdom. When you look at a baby, it's just that: a body you can look at and touch. But the person who takes shape within is formed by something you can't see and touch—the Spirit—and becomes a living spirit.
     "So don't be so surprised when I tell you that you have to be 'born from above'—out of this world, so to speak. You know well enough how the wind blows this way and that. You hear it rustling through the trees, but you have no idea where it comes from or where it's headed next. That's the way it is with everyone 'born from above' by the wind of God, the Spirit of God."

This “born again” thing, becoming something new – different, more God-inspired – than before, is not just a Jesus thing.  This theme runs through the entire Bible.  God is always inviting people into a new way of being that is grounded in who God is and empowered by the Spirit God provides.  Abraham sensed God calling him to leave everything behind to start fresh, different, led by God.  Throughout Israel’s history we see consistent invitations from God to get back to who they were meant to be – the people so close to God that God just oozed out of them in myriad ways.  The talk of wind?  That’s a reference to a vision God gave the prophet Ezekiel about what God wanted to do with Israel: even the deadest, driest bones can be brought back to life with the power of God’s Spirit. 

Borg notes (The Heart of Christianity, 107), “In the Gospels and in the rest of the New Testament, death and resurrection, dying and rising, are again and again a metaphor for personal transformation, for the psychological-spiritual process at the center of the Christian life.”  Here are just a few examples:

Because of this decision we don't evaluate people by what they have or how they look. We looked at the Messiah that way once and got it all wrong, as you know. We certainly don't look at him that way anymore. Now we look inside, and what we see is that anyone united with the Messiah gets a fresh start, is created new. The old life is gone; a new life burgeons! Look at it! – 2 Corinthians 5:16-17 (The Message)

I tried keeping rules and working my head off to please God, and it didn't work. So I quit being a "law man" so that I could be God's man. Christ's life showed me how, and enabled me to do it. I identified myself completely with him. Indeed, I have been crucified with Christ.  My ego is no longer central. It is no longer important that I appear righteous before you or have your good opinion, and I am no longer driven to impress God. Christ lives in me. The life you see me living is not "mine," but it is lived by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. I am not going to go back on that.   – Galatians 2:19-20 (The Message)

I'm absolutely convinced that nothing—nothing living or dead, angelic or demonic, today or tomorrow, high or low, thinkable or unthinkable—absolutely nothing can get between us and God's love because of the way that Jesus our Master has embraced us. – Romans 8:38-39 (The Message)

If I speak with human eloquence and angelic ecstasy but don't love, I'm nothing but the creaking of a rusty gate.
     If I speak God's Word with power, revealing all his mysteries and making everything plain as day, and if I have faith that says to a mountain, "Jump," and it jumps, but I don't love, I'm nothing.  If I give everything I own to the poor and even go to the stake to be burned as a martyr, but I don't love, I've gotten nowhere. So, no matter what I say, what I believe, and what I do, I'm bankrupt without love. – 1 Corinthians 13:1-3 (The Message)

Everything God has done, is doing, and will do is related to this invitation to be born again – as individuals, as relationships great and small, as an entire human race.  Jesus’ whole reason for living and dying was related to this invitation.  His mysterious resurrection provided experiential “proof” that God was indeed with him through it all, and that there is more to life than flesh and blood.  This may come as a shock, and initially disappointing, but this entire exchange between Jesus and Nicodemus is all about this life, right now, here on planet earth.  Not heaven.  This matters a lot, because part of the conversation gets to the famous quote of Jesus used in evangelism: For God so loved the world that he gave his only son, that whoever would believe in him would not perish, but have eternal life (John 3:16).  This has become a proof text to assure folks that all it takes is belief to get to heaven (and if you don’t believe, you are toast).  Biblical scholars of every stripe agree on this – it’s about this life, being born again into life God wishes for us, empowered and led by the God who created us to live our True Self.

I love how Eugene Peterson phrased it in his Message translation: "This is how much God loved the world: He gave his Son, his one and only Son. And this is why: so that no one need be destroyed; by believing in him, anyone can have a whole and lasting life.”  The “born again” life is the eternal life that comes by believing.  Which leads to another really important and disturbing point for many of you: believing isn’t what you believe it to be.

In our time and context, we think of belief as mental assent or agreement.  “I believe the world is round.”  “I believe in love.”  “I believe the United States is the greatest country in the world.”  “I believe the United States stands for peace in the world.”  “I believe the United States has the largest military in the world.”  “I believe in God.” Some of these statements are more fact-based than others that are more subjective.  The key thing to remember here is that for most of us in our time, to believe is to agree with a statement or sentiment on an intellectual plane.  That kind of belief isn’t very effective, however.  Certainly not enough to bring about eternal life, which Jesus stated was the key component for such a pursuit.  Could it be that Jesus’ remembered saying here about belief being the key to eternal life (and by necessity being born again) be based on a different rendering of the word?

The Greek language gives us the word that is translated “belief”.  That word connotes three different nuances, or facets that make up the whole.  Think of “belief” as a three legged stool.  Our Western, still-guided-by-scientific-thinking viewpoint does support part of what our first century ancestors in faith regarding belief.  Intellectual assent is part of it, one leg.  So, it matters.  But the stool won’t stand on one leg.  Belief isn’t belief if all it has to stand on is intellectual assent.  What are the remaining legs on the belief stool?

Another leg of the belief stool has to do with “heart”.  When we wonder if a person’s heart is “in it”, what are asking?  We’re wondering if they have any passion for the pursuit, any genuine concern or care about it.  If a person lacks heart, it means they have no drive, probably give their task weak effort, and are likely fairly apathetic, even if they mentally understand it.  I don’t know anybody addicted to smoking cigarettes who thinks it’s a good thing for their health.  They mentally agree.  But they don’t have the heart to quit.  In the ancient world, to believe was more than to agree intellectually.  Belief meant your heart was in it.  But head and heart are still just two legs.  The stool won’t stand.

The third leg of the belief stool relates to one’s hands.  Action.  Changed behavior.  Without action, your intellectual assent and heartfelt passion don’t account for much in your life and in the world we are called to serve.  Action can be as subtle as new behavior toward yourself and those you are in relationship with, like not adding to the problem when provoked, but seeking something redemptive in your response.  Action can be as magnificent as giving your life to a cause much bigger than yourself.  This is not in any way to be construed as “earning your way into God’s favor.”  On the contrary, this is in response to the favor you already have.  Perhaps Jesus’ brother, James, said it best: faith without works is dead (James 1:22, 2:17).  No life, eternal or otherwise.  Definitely not conducive to being born again.

One mistake I think the Church has made in articulating the “you must be born again” Good News is that we have overly focused on the initial “YES!” and have not adequately communicated that the first yes is one of perhaps thousands of yes’s to come.  We’ve done this because we’ve overly played up the “get your butt to heaven” piece of the message, so much so that we speak of being “saved” as a once-and-done thing, when in actuality, salvation is a process that lasts a lifetime.  We’re fully saved when we draw our first breath in heaven.  Until then, we’re invited to pursue and enjoy – with God’s help – as much eternal life as we choose.

I think one of the reasons so many people are leaving the church is because so many professing Christians stopped looking like Jesus not long after their first yes.  We’ve tucked our salvation away and adopted a warped version of life that is symbolized more by the American flag or the Almighty dollar than it is by the cross.  More by the pursuit of self than the giving away of self.  We’re not invited to be born again.  We’re invited to be born again and again and again and again and again – 70 X 7 times – as we work out what eternal life looks like as we mature, then choosing to believe with our head, heart, and hands.

When was the first time you were born again?  When was the last time you were born again?  When do you suspect will be the next time you will be born again?

 

Christocentric Alphapoem by Linda Murphy

Wonderful God who

Has always

Owned my heart

Down through time

Over years of humanity

You have

Opened us

Up

Sensed our

Anguish

Yearned to

Teach us of Your

Healing

And

Tender

Incredible

All-encompassing

Memory of who we can become in You

 

Some (hopefully) helpful stuff…

Reflection Questions: The Way of Exile and Homecoming

From Experiencing the Heart of Christianity, by Tim Scorer

The Road into Exile.  Exile is an inevitable feature of the human journey that leads us from birth, through the growth of self-awareness and self-concern, and into a place where we live lives that are conferred on us by our culture more than chosen by who we are truly meant to be (Marcus Borg, The Heart of Christianity, 117)

1.       Recall a time in your childhood when you remember yourself as a unique child, relatively unshaped by societal, parental, cultural, and religious messages.

2.       Recall a time in adolescence or early adulthood when you remember yourself as self-conscious and significantly shaped by the three A’s: appearance, achievement, and affluence.

3.       Recall a time in adulthood when you would say that you were living “a false self” and were exiled from your true identity.

The Road of Return and Exile.  The road of return is the road of recovering true self, the path to beginning to live from the inside our rather than the outside in.  Being “born again” involves dying to the false self and being born into an identity centered in God. The born-again experience happens in many ways.  Marcus Borg describes four.  Personally, we may know about one or all of them.  Reflecting on the born-again experience in these ways can help broaden its definition.  How have these been part of your experience?

1.       A sudden and dramatic moment in your life (a revelation, a life-changing epiphany, a sudden conversion).

2.       A gradual lifetime incremental process (experiencing the self-forgetfulness that accompanies a deepening trust in God).

3.       The shorter rhythms of our lives (may occur several times in periods of major change or transition).

4.       The micro-rhythms of daily life (each day forgetting God – becoming burdened – remembering God – rising from confinement).

 

 

 

Jesus: The Heart of God

If you’re reading this out of your own volition, I assume there’s something in you that finds Jesus compelling, or at least intriguing. 

Christianity is the only major world religion that says God is seen primarily through a person, which is both deeply compelling and, as it turns out, results in some pretty strong disagreements. Jesus may be the most compelling, controversial and fought over person in human history. Wars have started in his name, and peace movements have been spawned by those imitating him. People have killed each other over disagreements about who he was, and others have been killed for following him. You can find any version of Jesus you want - rich, poor, handsome, ugly, hippie, prude, party-animal. You name it, there’s a Jesus to match.

This is pretty understandable. We disagree about the significance of people who are a live, much less a person who lived 2000 years ago before journalism, history books and media. So then, in the sea of Jesuses, how do we choose? What do we make of him? 

Fortunately, Marcus Borg is here to help us. If you’ve been following along for the past few weeks, you’ve journeyed with Borg, via Pete, through some of the most fundamental aspects of Christian faith. And now, we arrive at the central figure of the whole Christian story: Jesus. 

Let me start with a confession: exactly what I believe about Jesus changes, almost weekly. So I’m not going to try to defend any particular understanding of Jesus. But I think that’s ok. To me, what we believe about Jesus isn’t as important as where Jesus leads us: to God.

As Borg has pointed out, we have a tendency to focus our faith on literalism. Literalism has boiled Jesus down to a set affirmations: Son of God, born of a virgin, physically resurrected, etc. But is the revelation of God just about agreeing to a set of facts? How boring is that? No one person can be boiled down to a set of facts, much less one of the most compelling figures in history. As Richard Rohr says, the literal meaning is always the least interesting.

When we get past our inclination to boil Jesus down to a set of literal facts, we just might end up somewhere more interesting: the heart of God. As Borg say, “Jesus is what can be seen of God embodied in a human life…He shows us the heart of God.”

Pre-Easter vs Post-Easter

Before getting too far into the weeds, Borg wants to make a really important distinction about the voices in the Gospels that give shape to Jesus. Namely, our Pre-Easter understanding of Jesus and our Post-Easter understanding of him. Here’s what he means. 

The Pre-Easter Jesus isn’t where most disagreements are found. The Pre-Easter Jesus was a first century Jewish man. He taught throughout Israel with a moderate following, and was executed by the Roman empire. This Jesus is gone, which sounds controversial ,but isn’t really.  Jesus does not currently exist in flesh and blood, like he did in the first century. Even the most conservative and liberal Christians seem to agree on this. Most people don’t think Jesus is roaming around in a human body somewhere, stuck on an island with Elvis and Tupac. 

The Post-Easter Jesus is a bit more wide-ranging.  It revolves around what Jesus became after his death. Particularly, how he was experienced by his early followers, and how we experience him today. These experiences are broad, and have branched off throughout history in many directions.

The difference between pre and post Easter understandings of Jesus may seem small, but it is important, especially when we read the stories about Jesus’ life. Namely, it means we let Jesus be a human being. We don’t assume that because he was entwined with God that he never worried or felt pain. We let him grow, learn and suffer. As it turns out, this is a way more interesting way to read the Jesus stories, and otherwise, we miss the point of a lot of those stories. 

Let me give you an example. In both Matthew and Mark, there’s a story that goes something like this:

From there, Jesus went to the regions of Tyre and Sidon. A Canaanite woman from those territories came out and shouted, “Show me mercy, Son of David. My daughter is suffering terribly from demon possession.”  But he didn’t respond to her at all.

His disciples came and urged him, “Send her away; she keeps shouting out after us.”

Jesus replied, “I’ve been sent only to the lost sheep, the people of Israel.”

But she knelt before him and said, “Lord, help me.”

He replied, “It is not good to take the children’s bread and toss it to dogs.”

She said, “Yes, Lord. But even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall off their masters’ table.”

Jesus answered, “Woman, you have great faith. It will be just as you wish.” And right then her daughter was healed. (Matthew 15:21-28)

People bend over backwards to try to justify how Jesus acts here, because it doesn’t seem very loving and God-like. But, if we actually let Jesus be a human being here, the story gets really compelling. It shows Jesus learning and growing. 

What we find in the beginning of the story is Jesus reflecting the prejudices of his day. He treats this foreign woman like most ancient men would - as less than, as a dog. Then something crazy happens. She doesn’t take it. She shames Jesus by saying “Ok, but you’re treating me even worse than a dog. What does that make you?” Then something even crazier happens. Jesus agrees! He learns. This foreign woman puts him in his place, points out his prejudice and he changes his mind. 

So if we want to experience the heart of God, perhaps we need to learn to face our prejudices and learn from those we think are less than. But we’d miss all of that if we don’t let Jesus be human.

The Nature of the Gospels

To really see where Jesus leads us, Borg suggests we need to understand the nature of the Gospels - the texts that narrate Jesus’ life. First, he points out that they’re a product of a developing tradition about Jesus. They were a collection of oral stories that where eventually written down about 40-60 years after Jesus’ death. Those early Christian communities where wrestling with who Jesus was, and trying to make meaning of the stories they had heard. 

This is important because it means we’re not reading a literal history of Jesus. We’re reading the reflections of Jesus’ followers as they look for the significance of his life.  

This realization can be jarring for some of us, especially if we’ve been taught to read the texts like a history textbook. But, when we look closer, we realize that trying to make these stories into literal historical accounts does a disservice to the texts. We’re holding them to a standard that didn’t exist at the time and keeps us from seeing what the texts are saying. 

Our version of history didn’t exist at that point in time. No one was trying to, or thought they could, record events exactly as they happened. How could you without pen, paper, wide spread literacy, photos or videos? 

Look at what Plutarch, an ancient writer says as he records events, 

“For it is not Histories that I am writing, but Lives…Accordingly, just as painters get the likenesses in their portraits from the face and the expression of the eyes, wherein the character shows itself, but make very little account of the other parts of the body, so I must be permitted to devote myself rather to the signs of the soul in men…”

When ancient writers wrote about the lives of others, they were more interested in expressing their “soul” or the essence of who they were. Of course, many of these stories were based on actual events, but they felt the liberty to fill in the gaps and paint with different colors. The writers of the Gospels were no different.

So then what are the ancient stories of Jesus? Borg thinks they’re a mix of memory and metaphor. They’re profoundly true, but not always literal. They combine the limited memories go Jesus’ followers with deeply true insights they learned from him, often expressed in symbolic stories.  

He gives the example of Jesus’ first miracle: turning water into wine. At face value, it seems like a pretty cool trick. And it kept the party going, so that’s great. But is the point just for Jesus to amaze people who were probably really drunk? Perhaps the writers were using familiar images to evoke something in the reader. 

For instance, when a reader heard a story about a wedding, they’d know that was a familiar metaphor for God’s relationship with humanity. When the story referenced the  third day, they almost certainly would have thought of resurrection. The writer isn’t just recording history. They’re stirring up the reader’s imagination, and asking them to see the deeper meaning beneath the story.

For instance, weddings weren’t hour long celebrations. They were huge parties, that lasted days. These celebrations sharply contrasted with their normal peasant lifestyle. Instead of working constantly, they were celebrating with friends and family. Instead of eating meager helpings of affordable food, they were feasting and enjoying things like meat and wine. 

And all of this is at the beginning of Jesus’ ministry. As Borg says, it’s as if the writers are trying to show where Jesus is trying to lead us: a wedding banquet. Not just a wedding banquet, but one where the wine never runs out. Not just a wedding banquet where the wine never runs out but also where the best is saved for last. We’re being invited to see the world as a divine celebration, and even when it seems like the celebration has ended, God is in the business of saving the best for last.  

Son of God: Statement or Image?

For some strange reason, we tend to think that the Bible is mostly making claims about Jesus. But if we look closely, the Bible speaks of Jesus in metaphors, which is quite a bit different than a declarative statement. We acknowledge this with some metaphors: bread, door, shepherd, vine, hen, and many more. But Borg thinks there’s one big metaphor we miss understand: Son of God.

While it sounds like a declarative statement about Jesus, it’s actually an image as much as those others. It conjured up certain things in the reader’s mind. In the Hebrew scriptures, Israel and some of its kings were called Son of God. Around Jesus’ time, some mystics called Son of God. Culturally in that time, a son could speak for their father in all matters. 

Politically, it made a statement about Caesar and power. Caesar was though to be a son of the gods, so the image challenged Roman imperial power. 

When we boil it down to a doctrinal statement, we miss what’s going on. The texts are trying to show us what it means to be full of God, in a way Israel had been longing for and that a political empire could never provide. As Borg puts it, “Jesus is, for us as Christians, the decisive revelation of what a life full of God looks like.” 

Here, and throughout the chapter, Borg chases an important rabbit trail. Namely, does Jesus being a decisive revelation of God mean the market is cornered on the divine? What about other religions? In short, no. Borg thinks that God is defined by, but not confined to Jesus. While is a really humble statement. We can claim that our path has led us to a life full of God without saying or knowing that others don’t.

I heard a helpful metaphor recently. Imagine that you’re staring at a wall full of holes. On the other side of those holes is light - divine light. If you want to see the source and shape of that light, you have to get up close and look through one particular hole. 

Or, as the Buddha said, if you want to strike water, don’t dig five shallow wells. Dig one deep one. 

The Death of Jesus

Jesus was killed. Executed by Rome to be exact. This was a fate left only for political troublemakers. These few facts are pretty well documented event in Roman, Jewish and Christian writings. So, while these ancient writings aren’t modern history textbooks, it’s a fairly safe bet to think they happened.

But there’s a deeper question. What does Jesus’ death mean? Was it part of a divine master plan, or a natural consequence of living an authentic life connected to God? Christians have argued about the meaning of Jesus’ death for centuries, and scripture doesn’t give a clean cut answer. Borg sees five main understandings of Jesus’ death described in scripture, which are: 

  1. Rejection and Vindication. This sees Jesus’ death and resurrection as a political statement. The governing authorities rejected Jesus, but God vindicates him, proving that his way has power. 
  2. Defeat of the Powers. This one starts with the same explanation as the previous theory, but goes a layer deeper. It assumes there’s something behind the authorities, namely “the powers”. While this sounds odd, it’s essentially the idea that evil can take on a life of its own, in the form of oppressive systems, wars, destructive ways of thinking and more. So Jesus’ death is about defeating any force that seeks to dominate, control and oppress.
  3. The Way. This idea sees Jesus’ death and resurrection as the path to spiritual and psychological transformation. The world is full of smaller deaths. Jesus shows us how to be transformed and experience resurrection. 
  4. Revelation. In this theory, Jesus’ death reveals how much God loves us. We see the depths of God’s compassion in how God’s willingness to experience our suffering. 
  5. Sacrificial. Jesus died for our sins. (More below…)

This last one needs some unpacking. It is likely the most common understanding today, at least in American Evangelicalism. But many of us have found it weird, troubling and not particularly compelling. Specifically, it seems to have some weird implications for God. It assumes God is angry and needs a sacrifice. God needs death to forgive. 

Borg is incredibly helpful here. He suggests that we’ve lost first century meaning of the metaphor of sacrifice. In Jesus’ time, God’s presence was confined to the temple. If you wanted to connect with God, you went to the temple. But, if you did something that made you unclean or broke part of the Mosaic law, you couldn’t go into the temple. Some of these “sins” required sacrifice before you could worship and enter in to the presence of God.

This is why Jesus was so angry when the temple was turned into a marketplace that exploited people. If you were poor, you literally couldn’t afford to experience God. God’s presence had gatekeepers.

So Jesus as a sacrifice isn’t making a statement about an angry, violent God. It’s making a statement about who can access God - everyone. It’s showing us what was always true. 

Here’s the ironic thing: we’ve put up another gate. We make mental ascent to certain statements about Jesus the new gatekeeper to God, when the whole thing was about knocking down gates. 

Metaphor and Sacrament

So if Jesus connects us to God, how does that happen? Borg sees Jesus leading us to God in two ways: as a metaphor and a sacrament. As a metaphor, we see God through Jesus. For Christians, Jesus is THE metaphor for God. Just as a metaphor reveals something to us, Jesus reveals to us who God is. 

As a sacrament, we experience God through Jesus. Sacraments are those things things that lead us to experience God. There are formal ones: communion and baptism. And there are informal ones: good conversation, music, art, family. For Christians, Jesus is the primary sacrament. Like a straw that leads you to a much needed drink, Jesus leads us into the depths of God. 

So, I’m pretty sure what I believe about Jesus will continue to change, but I’m equally confident about where he’ll lead me: into the heart of God.

God: The Heart of Reality

This is part four of a twelve week series based on Marcus Borg's The Heart of Christianity.

Why are you bothering with this whole faith thing?  Seriously – what’s your motivation?

I imagine that your responses are along the lines of learning about God, learning how to be a better person, making a difference in the world, etc.  Awesome.

If you blow the whole faith thing, what is your greatest fear?  If you turned your back on God entirely, what would you be most terrified might happen? Sorry for the clumsy wording – you get my point.

In the fourth chapter of his book, The Heart of Christianity, Marcus Borg walks the reader through three sets of comparisons: competing Worldviews, dominant Concepts of God, and resulting notions of the Character of God.  Here is a picture of those three sets for your observation:

Worldview, God, Character Comparisons.jpg

Most of you reading this are at least open to the idea that there is “MORE” to life than the particles and force fields that hold everything together in the universe.  I think I can safely assume that.  (For further reading on this subject I recommend Rob Bell’s What We Talk About When We Talk About God).

Assuming we’re on the same page in our pursuit of “MORE” leads us to thinking about God.  How we get our minds around God matters, as Borg notes: It makes a difference how we see the character of God, for how we see the character of God shapes our sense of what faithfulness to God means and thus what the Christian life is about (The Heart of Christianity, 66). 

With this last quote in mind, slowly read through the Concepts of God and The Character of God comparisons and imagine how these different perspectives shape what being “faithful” might mean.

For some of you reading this, your greatest fear if you blow off the whole faith/God thing is that you will pay a very serious price as soon as you die: hell.  Since CrossWalk is a church that seems to attract folks with no significant church background or those looking to recover from a damaging church background, I know this is true for a good number of you.  The reason you have this deeply rooted fear is because you have been operating in the Supernatural Theism way of orienting yourself to a God of requirements and rewards; a God of law.  Walk away from God and you’re screwed.  Forever.  Sucks to be you.  This view of God has been so strongly set in your brain that you experience real anxiety at the thought of challenging that view.  Yep, really sucks to be you – you can’t even question it without fear of burning for eternity.  Better not question anything.  Just keep doing what you’ve been told will keep God pleased and your butt out of hell…

I questioned it at a fairly early age – I was 13 years old.  I grew up in a mainline denomination as opposed to an Evangelical/Fundamental one.  This means that Supernatural Theism ruled the language, but the “turn or burn” rhetoric was absent from our pulpits.  The notion of forgiveness itself bothered me.  I couldn’t understand the whole “Jesus died as a sacrifice for my sins” piece.  I knew the story and the argument, but it just didn’t add up.  I even asked my sister  Ann, who went into a flurry of activity to help me “get it” – at one point she murmured under her breath, this kid is really screwed up…  True – I was not fitting into the Evangelical/Fundamental/Orthodox story even then.  That understanding of grace didn’t seem like grace at all.  It seemed incongruent that a loving God would punish someone forever if they didn’t believe the right thing.

Some people freak out when they hear or think this. They immediately jump to supposed heretical thinking about universalism, and counter with “axe murders and war mongers better not be in heaven”.  Borg has a good response to this: Unconditional grace is not about the afterlife, but the basis of our relationship with God in this life.  Is the basis for our life with God law or grace, requirements and rewards or relationship and transformation?  Grace affirms the latter (Ibid., 67).  Further, Borg connects the dots between hosting a view of Supernatural Theism versus Panentheism and the life it fosters:

What’s at stake in the question of God’s character is our image of the Christian life.  Is Christianity about requirements?  Here’s what you must do to be saved [and stay saved]. Or is Christianity about relationship and transformation?  Here’s the path: follow it.  Both involve imperatives, but one is a threat, the other an invitation (Ibid., 68).

If Supernatural Theism works for you and is making you more Jesus-like, then keep it going.  It is biblical – it’s just not the only biblical way to view God.  It is a way readily understood by our ancient ancestors who lived in a time when sacrifices were a regular component of religious cultic practices.  I can understand that perspective.  I can respect and appreciate the view.  But I do not espouse the view.  It does not resonate with me, and in many ways creates dissonance, is a distraction, and even a road block in my relationship with God and my quest to know God and become more aligned with God in my life.

The panentheistic alternative – also biblical – resonates deeply with me.  In that view there is room for wonder, mystery, awe.  As Borg notes, God is not separate, but right here, and more than here.  Expansive, yet deeply personal in God’s intention and interaction in my life.  I can tell you that I have experienced the reality of the presence of God in this approach, even at times when the other view would tell me it would be impossible to enjoy such presence given my state.

For those of you who have been reared in a Supernatural Theistic paradigm, making this shift really hard work.  Keep it up.  It is worth it.  If you cannot live with it, trust me as one you know personally that there is more to learn.  You can still respect what you were raised with and respect those who really resonate with it.  The songs and verses can still play a meaningful role when viewed in context.  But the good news is that there are new songs to sing that speak a different way that brings life and love into our lives and into the world, that raises the bar on behavior away from law and into covenant and love.  It leads to a deep, mature life of response to the love we experience, and helps us to love more fully personally and as proponents of social justice.  It is rich and deep.  A life-pursuit of discovery and growth.

The Bible: The Heart of the Tradition

This is the third teaching in the twelve part series based on Marcus Borg's book, The Heart of Christianity.

The Bible is foundational for the Christian faith.  Yet many people have left the church because of how the text has been handled, and how earlier Christianity has demanded that the Bible to be understood.  For people who grew up with the earlier Christian view, the Bible is seen as God’s product, so powerfully influenced by the Holy Spirit that it is inerrant (there are no errors) and infallible (it cannot be wrong).  To question this way of thinking about the Bible puts one immediately on thin ice, and may even call one’s faith into question.  According to foundational statements that support both Fundamental and Evangelical Christianity (both are earlier expressions of the faith), you are not a “real” Christian if you don’t see the Bible as God’s product.  And if you’re not a real Christian, you have no real hope.  Better invest in some fire-resistant pajamas for your afterlife experience…

If you’ve been raised in that earlier tradition, messing with the idea of the Bible as God’s product feels like heresy because that’s how you’ve been taught.  This is a terrifying venture.

Millions of people – and that number is growing – have simply walked away from even thinking about the Bible at all because they know enough to know that to see it as God’s product doesn’t make sense.  Yet the Bible is central to the Christian faith – to chuck it essentially destroys the faith, because it is the central text that shapes the faith in the first place.

This chapter of Borg’s book will be helpful for both types of readers, giving you a way to embrace the Bible without checking your brain at the door, and giving you confidence that your hope may not be in jeopardy – in fact, it may be emboldened.

The primary difference between the earlier-and-currently-loudest rendition of Christianity and what is emerging ultimately comes down to determining how the Bible came to be.  The earlier version quickly quotes from Paul’s letter to his protégé, Timothy: All Scripture is inspired by God and is useful to teach us what is true and to make us realize what is wrong in our lives. It corrects us when we are wrong and teaches us to do what is right. God uses it to prepare and equip his people to do every good work (2 Tim. 3:16-17).  This quickly led to people creating the bumper sticker that says, The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it.  Essentially, that verse is interpreted as saying that God wrote the Bible, even if human hands were used.  It’s not a good or even correct interpretation, but it’s popular, and has been used to justify a lot of awful treatment of people in the world: slaves, women, the LGBTQ community, people of other faith traditions, and people who don’t agree with this interpretation.

The emerging view of Christianity view the Bible as a human product in response to God, written for their current audience with great care and prayer.  The Spirit of God was surely sought and received, but the scrolls the biblical writers wrote on were filled with their fingerprints: their worldview, their sensibilities, their agenda, everything.  If we think about who God is, we can affirm that God would not want to wipe those fingerprints away, as God uses people as they are, capitalizing on who they are, working in cooperation with people’s total identity to bring redemption into the world.  In this view, the Bible is an historical product of two historical communities: Israel and the early Christian movement.  The truth that it contains is related to the time and place in which it was written.  Some of those truths easily relate to all times.  Others are clearly time-specific, need to be appreciated, yet kept as a relic from the past that no longer speaks directly to our current reality.  When the Bible is approached this way, a lot of the problems disappear.

Within the emerging paradigm, the Bible is still understood to be divinely inspired: the Spirit of God surely moved in the lives of the people who produced the Bible.  Their written response to God’s movement is the Bible we hold.  By extension, this way of viewing the Bible has implications for the sacred texts of faith traditions beyond Judaism and Christianity.  Using the same criteria, we can appreciate what they are communicating in their time and place in history, too.

In the emerging view, the Bible is Sacred Scripture.  Our ancestors declared that what we have were the most important documents to the faith in it’s earliest expressions.  The Bible provides the foundation for our belief, identity, and wisdom for how we think about reality and how to live.  The text is sacred in the sense that it serves to connect us to the divine.  The Bible is no less important in the emerging tradition than the earlier tradition – the primary difference is essentially on who gets the most credit for producing it.

The final major distinction Borg recognizes as it relates to the Bible is that it needs to be appreciated as metaphor, and not necessarily literally.  This might initially freak people out who have been raised with the earlier paradigm, as it might conjure up the idea of the Bible-as-fiction, or worse, Fake News.  Borg notes that modern Western culture identifies truth with factuality, and devalues metaphorical language.  When we ask the question, “Is that story true?” we are usually asking, “Did that actually happen?”  This bias toward factuality blinds us to metaphorical truth – something we all operate and employ quite frequently and comfortably without apology, even while we denounce it. We are hypocrites in this regard, as I would guess the two most memorable teachings of Jesus which communicated great truth were parables.  The parable of the Prodigal Son and the parable of the Good Samaritan are widely known and embraced as communicating great truth about the love God has for people and what love looks like when it’s lived out faithfully.  Yet they are stories.  Not factual events.  They never happened, yet they’ve happened a million times.  Metaphor, as Borg notes, is not to be understood as less-than-factual, but rather more than literal.  Read that again.  Borg further contends that “the more-than-literal meaning of biblical texts has always been most important,” and that “only in the last few centuries has their factuality been emphasized as crucial.”

One of my favorite musicals is Into the Woods, which dovetails multiple children’s fables together into a crazy mish-mashed adventure.  I love it because of the truth it speaks about the human experience.  Great truth is communicated through the lyrics and characters and storyline.  The metaphor is more than factual.

With the understanding of the Bible as historical, sacred, and metaphorical, let’s take a look at a text (Luke 8:22-25, NLT) and see what we can do with it, and what God might do with us.

One day Jesus said to his disciples, “Let’s cross to the other side of the lake.” So they got into a boat and started out. As they sailed across, Jesus settled down for a nap. But soon a fierce storm came down on the lake. The boat was filling with water, and they were in real danger.
     The disciples went and woke him up, shouting, “Master, Master, we’re going to drown!”
When Jesus woke up, he rebuked the wind and the raging waves. Suddenly the storm stopped and all was calm. Then he asked them, “Where is your faith?”
     The disciples were terrified and amazed. “Who is this man?” they asked each other. “When he gives a command, even the wind and waves obey him!”

Debate all you want as to whether this story is literally true.  At the end of the day, however, the metaphorical truth is what will be of actual value.  I am confident that over the millions of times this story has been shared, the application has not been, “So, if you’re ever in a small watercraft in the middle of the Sea of Galilee, and a storm comes on real fast and threatens to capsize you, remember that Jesus calmed the storm.”  I am certain the power of the story has come across something like this: “I felt like the storms of life were going to take me out.  I cried out to God for help.  Somehow, some way, a peace came over me that I cannot explain, and I got through it.  It’s like God gave me calm in the middle of the storm like Jesus did with the disciples.”  For a group of Christians in the first century who may have been consistently hiding from those who threatened to literally kill them, this was particularly comforting and true.  Truth spoken into their historical context.  It was part of the sacred story that helped them understand the nature of God and everything else, shaped their identity, and provided wise counsel to help them move forward in the way of Christ.  This story provided great truth, regardless of whether or not it actually happened literally. 

Here is a helpful tool to help you gain metaphorical truth from a text:

When I hear the story of ______, I see my life with God in this way: _____________.

Let’s  end with a Psalm and a reflection in light of the text we viewed.  Held together, we see that Luke was tying God and Jesus together, to encourage readers to see that thread and have hope.

God visits the earth and waters it.

God turns a desert into pools of water,

a parched land into springs of water.

The river of God is full of water.

God waters the furrows abundantly,

softening the earth with showers,

and blessing its growth.

– Adapted from Psalm 65:9-10

 

Christ sails with us to the other side.

Christ turns a raging storm into calm waters,

a place of terror into amazement.

The sea of Christ is full of possibility.

Christ rebukes the wind,

softening the storm with authority,

and accompanying our way.

So true.